VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

P.Devadass (Tr 1829) v. Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd.,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
1 April 2026
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP 12320/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.T. Asha

Judgment

Order The Writ Petition has been filed seeking to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to pay the petitioners interest for the belated payment of PF, gratuity and earned leave salary at the rate of 12 percentage per annum within a specified time, as may be fixed by this Court.

¶2The case of the petitioners is that they were appointed in the respondent-Transport Corporation on various dates and retired from service on

31.05.2024, 31.05.2024, 31.05.2024, 30.04.2023, 02.07.2024, 31.03.2024,

30.04.2018 and 28.12.2020 respectively. However, the terminal benefits have been settled to the petitioners on 02.12.2025, 02.12.2025, 31.05.2024,

12.02.2025, 02.12.2025, 25.08.2025, 22.09.2019 and 02.12.2022 but no interest has been paid for the delayed period. Therefore, the petitioners had submitted representations to the respondent dated 03.02.2026, 03.02.2026, 03.02.2026,

24.12.2025, 03.02.2026, 16.02.2026, 16.02.2026 and 03.02.2026, requesting to pay interest for the delayed period. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed. Page4 of 6

¶3The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent would fairly submit that they are willing to pay the interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of the eligible and admissible amount.

¶4Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶5In view of the above submission of the learned Standing Counsel, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of admissible terminal benefits from the date of retirement till the date of actual disbursal of the terminal benefits of the petitioners within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 01-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SRN Page5 of 6 To The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., No.12, Ramakrishna road, Salem-7. WPoNo.o12320oofo2026 P.T.ASHAoJ. SRN WPoNo.o12320oofo2026 AND WMPoNO.o13460oOFo2026 01-04-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA AND WMP NO. 13460 OF 2026 1. P.Devadass (TR 1829) S/o.Paramasivam, No.16/14, West Madha Kovil Street, Sendharapatti Post, Kengavalli Taluk, Salem District - 636 110. 2. N.Elango (FD5101) S/o.Nagappan, No.81/2, Kottai Street, Kaveripattinam Post, Krishnagiri District - 635112. 3. G.Elangovan (MCR513) S/o.Gopal, D.No.4/44, Devasamuthiram, Kattikanapalli, Krishnagiri District - 635 002. 4. R.Sekar (DR 5807) S/o.Ramasamygounder, No.2/189, Vagurappampatti post, Karimangalam taluk, Dharmapuri - 635202. 5. V.Mathaiyan (CR6402) S/o.Javaru @ Vediappan, No.2/248, Pannandhoor post, Ppochampalli Taluk, Salem - 635 123. Page2 of 6 6. K.Varadharajan (DR6490) S/o.Kannugounder, No.85, Keezhkuppam Village and Post, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District - 636 902. 7. R.Shanmugam (CR 5659) S/o.Raji Gounder, No.17/1, Kerrakottaalli Post, Morappur via, Maapireddypatti Taluk, Dharmapuri District - 635 305. 8. S.Neelamegam (CR 6078) S/o.Solaiyan, No.4/239, Anna Nagar Colony, Paruvadhanalli, Ponnagaram Post and Taluk, Dharmapuri - 636 813. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem-7. ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to pay the petitioners interest for the belated payment of PF, gratuity and earned leave salary at the rate of 12 percentage per annum within a specified time, as may be fixed by this Court, award costs. Page3 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Mr. R.Krishnaswamy For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Raja Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.