VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Raghu @ K.Raghunath v. The Inspector General of Registration

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 13260/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register the sale deed bearing pending No.P/Bagalur/274/2025 and release the same to the petitioner within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2According to the petitioner, he is unable to register the sale deed since in the official website of the Registration Department, there is no proper guideline value for the village morefully disclosed in the sale deed presented by the petitioner for registration.

¶3Mr. U. Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. On instructions, he would submit that due to technical glitch in the official website of the Registration Department, the sale deed of the petitioner could not be registered by the sixth respondent. He would submit that within a period of six weeks from today, the said technical glitch will be rectified and the sale deed presented by the petitioner can be registered.

¶4The undertaking given by the learned Special Government Pleader is recorded by this Court.

¶5Accordingly, this Court directs the sixth respondent to take a final decision with regard to the registration of the sale deed bearing pending No.P/Bagalur/274/2025 presented by the petitioner for registration within a period of six weeks from today.

¶6In case, the sixth respondent decides to refuse registration of the sale deed presented by the petitioner, the sixth respondent shall pass a speaking order, as to why the sale deed presented by the petitioner cannot be registered within a period of six weeks from today.

¶7Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 15-04-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To

1.The Inspector General of Registration Office of the Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Mylapore, Chennai.

2.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District.

3.The District Registrar, Krishnagiri District.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer cum Sub Collector, Office of the Sub Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

5.The Tahsildar Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

6.The Sub Registrar, Bagalur, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District. ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

15-04-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. Raghu @ K.Raghunath S/o. Krishnappan, No.2/65 Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Bagalur, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General of Registration Office of the Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Mylapore, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District. 3.The District Registrar, Krishnagiri District. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer cum Sub Collector, Office of the Sub Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. 5.The Tahsildar Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 6.The Sub Registrar, Bagalur, Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondents to invoke action and make proper guide line value for Eluvapalli (Perigai) Village, Shoolagiri Taluk on the official website of registration department and consequently direct the 6th Respondent to register petitioner sale deeds P/Bagalur 274/2025 on the file of 6th Respondent within a reasonable Time as may be fixed by this Court For Petitioner(s): T.Ananthasekaer For Respondent: Mr. U. Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.