VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

A.Ganessane v. The Government of Puducherry

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 12706/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to revise and fix the guideline value for the land, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition. Page2 of 4

2.According to the petitioner, he is the owner of the land, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition. According to him, earlier, land acquisition proceedings were initiated in respect of the land, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition. According to the petitioner, the land acquisition proceedings have got lapsed and this Court had passed an order in a writ petition filed by the land owners declaring that the land acquisition proceedings had lapsed. According to the petitioner, the guideline value has not been revised and fixed for the property, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, despite the fact that the land acquisition proceedings have got lapsed. In view of the same, the petitioner had given a representation to the respondents on 10.02.2026, requesting them to revise and fix the guideline value for the property, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this petition.

3.Mr.Ramasamy Meyyappan, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Page3 of 4

5.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 10.02.2026, seeking for revising and fixing the guideline value for the land, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 09-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VGA To

¶1The Government of Puducherry Represented by its Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Puducherry

¶2The Deputy Collector, (Revenue) (North) Puducherry

¶3The Chief Engineer Building and Road (Central) Division, public Work Department, Puducherry WPoNo.o12706oofo2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSEoJ. VGA WPoNo.o12706oofo2026 09-04-2026 Page4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE A.Ganessane ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. the Government of Puducherry Represented by its Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Puducherry 2. The Deputy Collector, (Revenue) (North) Puducherry 3. The Chief Engineer Building and Road (Central) Division, public Work Department, Puducherry ..Respondent(s) directing the Respondents herein to revise and fix the guideline value for the lands in Survey No.79/4B Thattanchavady village, Puducherry District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.R.Suresh For Respondent(s): Mr.Ramasamy Meyappan(Pondy) Govt Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.