Salamon @ Solomon v. State Rep.By. the Inspector of Police,

ORDER The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.228 of 2019 dated 11.07.2019 on the file of the first respondent police.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 11.07.2019, at about 07.15 a.m., the respondent police received information that a group of villagers from Narasingapuram engaged in a road blockade near Narasingapuram Bus Stand on the Poonamallee-Arakkonam Highway, protesting against acute drinking water scarcity. The concerned officials arrived at the spot and held talks with the protesting public. Upon assurance given by the officials to provide necessary drinking water facilities, the majority of the public dispersed peacefully. But the petitioner along with 28 others continued the protest. Hence, a case in Crime No.228 of 2019 registered by the first respondent Police for the offences under Sections 145, 188 and 341 of I.P.C.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that from the facts of the instant case it is clear, no public lodged any complaint of any disturbance. Page3 of 6 Further the alleged act was only a peaceful protest expressing a genuine grievance relating to basic necessity of drinking water, which is protected under the fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution of India. There is no order produced to show whether there was any restriction. The points raised by the petitioners are similar to the facts of the cases in Jeevanandham and others vs. The Inspector of Police, Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District reported in (2018 2 LW (Crl) 606) and Sri Raja vs Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station Virudhunagar District and others (Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019, decided on 30.08.2019), in which the proceedings were quashed for non compliance of procedures. Hence, he prayed to quash the proceedings pending against the petitioners.

¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent Police confirmed, there is no compliant from any public and no materials available to show, on the day of protest, there was any proclamation imposing restrictions of assembly.

¶5Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record. Page4 of 6

¶6It is seen, no public lodged any complaint of any disturbance, further there is nothing to show whether any prohibitory order was in force, and proclamation issued following the procedures. Showing protest is a democratic right, guaranteed under Constitution. Therefore, the FIR cannot be sustained and it is liable to be quashed.

¶7Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the F.I.R. in Crime No.228 of 2019, pending on the file of the first respondent police, is quashed as against the petitioners. The petitioners are discharged from all charges. 15-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RSI Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Inspector of Police, P6, Mappedu Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

¶2The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o9236oofo2026 M.NIRMALoKUMAR,oJ. RSI CRLoOPoNo.o9236oofo2026 15-04-2026 Page6oofo6

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR Salamon @ Solomon S/o. Munusamy, No.423, Small Street, Narasingapuram, Thiruvallur District. Tamil Nadu - 631 402. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State Rep.by. The Inspector of Police, P-6, Mappedu Police Station, Thiruvallur District. 2. R.Guna S/o. Rajagopal, Village Administrative Officer, Thiruvallur Taluk. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, praying to call for the entire records pertaining to Crime No.228 of 2019 dated 11.07.2019 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.M.Raghu Ram For Respondent-1: Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Additional Public Prosecutor Page2 of 6