VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

V.Gunasekaran v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 March 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 11939/2026

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents not to carry out any subdivision or changes in the revenue records in respect of the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition based on the petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2025.

2.The petitioner claims that there is a partition suit pending between the petitioner and the parties who had approached the 2nd respondent for the purpose of subdivision of the property. According to the petitioner, since a partition suit is pending, the official respondents are prohibited from considering any application for subdivision or for changes in the revenue records. The petitioner Page2 of 6 had already stated his objections through his letter dated 19.12.2025 to the respondents, requesting them not to consider any application seeking for subdivision or changes in the revenue records for the subject property.

3.The petitioner apprehends before this Court that without considering the objections of the petitioner, the respondents may subdivide or change the revenue records of the property based on the request made by the third party, who is also a party to the partition suit.

4.Necessarily, the petitioner's objections will have to be considered by the official respondents before taking a decision as to whether the property can be subdivided or not and whether changes can be made to the revenue records for the subject property.

5.For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the 2nd respondent who is the competent authority to give due consideration to the objections raised by the petitioner through his letter dated 19.12.2025, as well as supporting documents produced by him, objecting to the subdivision of the property or changes in the revenue records requested by the third party, who is the party to the partition suit and only after giving due consideration to the Page3 of 6 same, the 2nd respondent shall take a final decision as to whether the objections submitted by the petitioner can be entertained or not. In case the 2nd respondent decides to reject the petitioner's objections, necessarily, the 2nd respondent will have to pass a speaking order with regard to those objections, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 26-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GSA To

¶1The District collector Chengalpattu District.

¶2The Tahsildar, Cheyyur Taluk office, Cheyyur-603 302.

¶3The Taluk Surveyor Cheyyur Taluk, having office at cheyyur taluk office, Cheyyur-603 302.

¶4The Revenue Inspector Kodur Firka Having office at Koovathur Village, Koovathur-603 305.

¶5The Village Administrative officer Vadapattinam Village, Page4 of 6 Cheyyur-603 305. Page5 of 6

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA and W.M.P.No.13029 of 2026 26-03-2026 Page6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.No.13029 of 2026 V.Gunasekaran S/o.Vedhachalam, residing at Vadapattinam village, Mugaiyur Post, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalpattu District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector Chengalpattu District. 2. The Tahsildar, Cheyyur Taluk office, Cheyyur-603 302. 3. The Taluk Surveyor Cheyyur Taluk, having office at Cheyyur Taluk office, Cheyyur-603 302. 4. The Revenue Inspector Kodur Firka Having office at Koovathur Village, Koovathur-603 305. 5. The Village Administrative officer Vadapattinam Village, Cheyyur-603 305. Page1 of 6 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents not to carry out any sub-division or charges in the revenue records in respect of the property comprised in S.No.116/1, Vadapattinam Village, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalpattu District, till disposal of the suit in O.S.No.672 of 2023 on the file of Additional District Court, Chengalpattu, without considering the petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.C.Ashok Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.