VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

C.Selvaragul, v. The District Collector,

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 January 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 11427/2024

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to call for the records of the second respondent vide online Notification i.e., Advt.No.1 of 2024, dated 09.03.2024 and quash the same and direct the 2nd respondent to issue fresh notification, granting 75% to the PAPs upto 2022 and 25% to the PAPs from 2023 onwards.

¶2Heard Mr.R.Surendran, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent and Mr.N.Nithyanandam, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent.

¶3The case of the petitioner is that his father owned agricultural land in Valayamadevi, Keezhpathi Village, Bhuvanagiri Taluk, which was acquired by the second respondent in the year 2006 for mining purposes. An award in Award No.23 of 2009 dated 05.10.2009 was passed and compensation was paid, and possession of the land was taken by the second respondent. The said land was the primary source of livelihood for the petitioner's family and therefore the petitioner, being a legal heir, is entitled to employment under the Page3 of 5 Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme as a Project Affected Person (PAP) in terms of the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The second respondent issued Advertisement No.1 of 2024 dated 09.03.2024 inviting applications from Project Affected Persons for training by allocating 50% of slots to recent awardees and persons issued notices under Section 3(1) and 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, which is arbitrary and prejudicial to earlier awardees like the petitioner who have been awaiting employment for several years. Hence, aggrieved by the said impugned notification, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court may grant liberty to the petitioner to file a separate writ petition claiming employment rights on the basis of the scheme under which the petitioner's land was acquired.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking liberty to file a separate writ petition claiming employment rights on the basis of the scheme under which the petitioner's land was acquired, this Court is inclined to grant such liberty. Page4 of 5

¶6Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a separate writ petition claiming employment rights on the basis of the scheme under which the petitioner's land was acquired, in accordance with law. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 22-01-2026 (2/3) Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order ANU To

¶1The District Collector Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.

¶2The Chief General Manager (HR), NLC India Limited, Recruitment Cell/HR Department/Corporate Office, Block-1, Neyveli-607 801 Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu Page5 of 5

M.DHANDAPANI, J. ANU and WMP.Nos.13083 & 13169 of 2024 22-01-2026 (2/3)

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP.Nos.13083 & 13169 of 2024 Selvaragul.C S/o.Chella Durai, No.1/63, Road Street, Kil Valayamadevi And (po), Bhuvanagiri Taluk,Cuddalore District -608 704. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Cuddalore District, Cuddalore. 2. The Chief General Manager (HR), NLC India Limited, Recruitment Cell/HR Department/Corporate Office, Block-1, Neyveli-607 801 Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent vide online Notification i.e., Advt.No.1 of 2024, dated 09.03.2024 and quash the same and direct the 2nd respondent to issue fresh notification, granting 75% to the PAPs upto 2022 and 25% to the PAPs from 2023 onwards. Page2 of 5 For Petitioner(s): Ms.R.Chithra Devi For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Surendran Additional Government Pleader for R1 Mr.N.Nithyanandam for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.