VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Dhanalakshmi v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 12805/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to cancel the separate patta Nos.226, 471, 484 and 38 issued by the 4th respondent in the name of the 5th respondent more fully disclosed in the prayer to the writ petition, based on her representation dated 05.01.2026.

¶2According to the petitioner, the 5th respondent had obtained illegal patta Nos.276, 471, 484 and 38 in his name for the properties more fully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner has filed supporting documents along with this writ petition in support of the petitioner's case. This Page3 of 6 Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the same.

¶3The petitioner seeks for cancellation of Patta Nos.226, 471, 484 and 38 through this writ petition. The petitioner had also given a representation on 05.01.2026 to the official respondents requesting them to cancel the aforesaid pattas standing in the name of the 5th respondent. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court.

¶4Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 4. Since no adverse orders are passed against the 5th respondent, notice to the 5th respondent is dispensed with.

¶5No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the 5th respondent and any other third party, whom the 2nd respondent deems fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶6This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation. Page4 of 6

¶7For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of, by directing the 2nd respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner's representation, dated 05.01.2026 seeking for cancellation of patta Nos.226, 471, 484 and 38 for the properties more fully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the 5th respondent and any other third party, whom the 2nd respondent deems fit to enquire, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 09-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RKA Page5 of 6 To

¶1The District collector Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

¶2The Revenue Divisional officer Krishnagiri Division, Krishnagiri Dsitrict.

¶3The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

¶4The Tahsildar Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District, WPoNo.o12805oofo2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSE,oJ. RKA WPoNo.o12805oofo2026 09-04-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Dhanalakshmi W/o.Pachaiyappan, No.3/177, Mampatty Village and Post, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District-636 902. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 2. The Revenue Divisional officer Krishnagiri Division, Krishnagiri Dsitrict. 3. The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 4. The Tahsildar Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District, 5. N.Anbalagan s/o.Nagappan, Konar Kottai, Thalihalli post, Kaveripattinam via, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri Disrict-635 112 ..Respondent(s) This writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to cancel Page2 of 6 the separate patta Nos.226, 471, 484 and 38 issued by the 4th respondent vide proceedings dated 30.09.2015 in respect of the lands comprised in survey Nos.2/3A, 2/3C, 2/1.3A, 2/20, 3/1A4/3, 3/6B, 3/12, 7/3, 7/11, 56/11, 56/2AM, 56/2AD, 56/1AF, 56/2AF, 56/2X, 56/2U, Old Survey No.56/2AA (New Survey No.56/2AA), 56/2Q, 56/2B, Old Survey No.56/2AD (new Survey No.56/2AD2), 96/3 and 96/8 totally measuring an extent of 7.69 acres of agricultural lands situated at Thallihalli Village, Kaveripattinam Sub Registration District, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri Registration District, standing in the name of the 5th respondent based on petitioners representation dated 19.01.2026 and consequently direct issuance of joint patta in favour of the lawful co-sharers For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Kaviveerappan For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash Govt.Advocate For R1 to R4 ND/W - R5 -Pvt

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.