VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ms Nvs Sarees v. The Deputy State Tax Officer 1

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 April 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 12612/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan

Judgment

ORDER Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order bearing GSTIN : 33ACLPR2297M1ZY/2021-2022 along with consequential

order in

FORM

GST

DRC-07

bearing Ref.No.ZD330825004361S dated 01.08.2025 of the Respondent, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 27.02.2025 wherein the Petitioner was also called upon to file a reply by 31.03.2025.

¶4The Petitioner was also issued with Reminders on 19.05.2025,

12.06.2025 and 17.07.2025 which called upon the Petitioner to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. The Petitioner however neither filed any reply nor appeared for the personal hearings. Thus, the impugned Order has been passed.

¶5It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on

27.03.2026.

¶6At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 25% of the disputed tax as a condition for de novo adjudication.

¶7The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court Bundle, which is extracted hereunder:-

"Consent to deposit 25% tax demand."

¶8In view of the above, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶9Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 27.02.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

01.08.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 27.02.2025.

¶10In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply / pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶11It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the deposit of 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶12In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶13Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶14This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

02.04.2026 arb To: The Deputy State Tax Officer-1, Office of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Sathyamangalam Assessment Circle, SF No.137/1B, 137/2, Puliampatti Pirivu, Sathy-Erode Road, Ariyappampalayam, Erode, Tamil Nadu – 638 402.

C.SARAVANAN, J. arb and W.M.P.Nos.13759 and 13762 of 2026

02.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.04.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.13759 and 13762 of 2026 M/s.N.V.S.Sarees, Represented by its Proprietor Rajan Palanisamy ... Petitioner Vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1, Office of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Sathyamangalam Assessment Circle, SF No.137/1B, 137/2, Puliampatti Pirivu, Sathy-Erode Road, Ariyappampalayam, Erode, Tamil Nadu – 638 402. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the Respondent in the impugned order in GSTIN : 33ACLPR2297M1ZY/2021-22 dated 01.08.2025 along with the consequential proceedings under Section 73 in FORM GST DRC-07 vide Ref.No.ZD330825004361S dated 01.08.2025 for the FY 2021-22 to quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.A.Rithika For Respondent : Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.