- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 June 2026
- Bench
- C.Kumarappan
- Case no.
- CRL OP 9280/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow C.Kumarappan
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
25.11.2023 for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c) read with 22(c), 23(c), Page2 of 4 28 and 29 of NDPS Act in F.No.48/1/19/2023-NCB/MDS on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that based on a secret information with regard to the illegal transportation of Ganja, on 21.10.2023, when the respondent police conducted a search in FPO Chennai of the Customs Authority, found the accused in illegal possession of 5.98 kgs of contraband and hence the case.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the respondent police have not searched the premises of the petitioner and no narcotic substance has been recovered from the place of the petitioner. He would also submit that the petitioner is a sole bread winner of his family and he has old aged parents, wife and children and he has been under judicial custody since 25.11.2023 and hence prayed to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
¶4The above contention was totally objected by the learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police and he would submit that quantity of contraband involved in this case is a commercial quantity and therefore, he strongly objected the bail application. Page3 of 4
¶5I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side.
¶6While perusing the case, according to the prosecution, there was a recovery of 5.98 kgs of MDMA, which is a commercial quantity. Though the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner presently raised the defence, this Court is of the view that the said defence cannot be construed as a defence to overcome the rigors under Section 37 of NDPS Act and therefore, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
¶7Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 05-06-2026 MJS Note:
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. Page4 of 4
C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MJS To
¶1The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
¶2The Junior Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Chennai Zonal Unit. 05-06-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Sam @ Samuel Chinweike Anoh S/o Remond, No.6, Muniyappa Garden, Kadachanalluru, Tiruchengodu Taluk, Namakkal District ..Petitioner(s) Vs Union of India through: The Junior Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau Chennai Zonal Unit (R.R.No.45 of 2023 in NCB F.No.48/1/19/2023- NCB/MDS)Chennai ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner 1st accused on bail in R.R.No.45 of 2023 in NCB F.No.48/1/19/2023-NCB/MDS on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/S. S.Vedhavel For Respondent(s): Mr.N.P. Kumar, Special Public Prosecutor.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.