VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Viswa v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 April 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
8248/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2), 326(a) of BNS Act r/w Section 21(5) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulations) Act, 1957, in Crime No.63 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. Page2 of 5

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was illegally quarried 1/4 unit of river sand by using a bullock cart. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought anticipatory bail for the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that no previous case has been registered against the petitioner. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶5I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and also perused the records available

¶6From the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) it is seen that the petitioner has no bad antecedents. Though, this Court views the offence of theft of natural resources and its exploitation as serious offence, taking into consideration of the fact that he has no previous Page3 of 5 case, and upon the fond hope that he would mend themselves in future and would not come under the adverse notice of the respondent, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on anticipatory bail, subject to certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Chengam, Tiruvannamalai District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

(a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am and 5.30 pm. for a period of six weeks and thereafter as and when required;

(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate Page4 of 5 actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 02-04-2026 DRL To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Chengam, Tiruvannamalai District.

2.The Inspector of Police Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o8248oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. DRL CRLoOPoNo.o8248oofo2026 02-04-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Viswa S/o. Murugan, Thokkavadi Village, Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Crime No.63/2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest pending in Crime No.63/2026 on the file of Respondent Police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.L. Venkatesan For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.