VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

G.Ravichanthiran v. The District Collector,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 12824/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent not to transfer the patta in the name of the 3rd respondent, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 18.03.2026.

¶2The grievance of the petitioner is that the 3rd respondent is seeking for grant of patta in his name for the property more fully described in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. According to the petitioner, the 3rd respondent does not have any legal right to obtain patta for the subject property. The petitioner had submitted a representation to the 2nd respondent on

18.03.2026 objecting to the grant of patta in favour of the 3rd respondent. Since the same has not been considered, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court.

¶3Mr. D. Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2. The learned Special Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that as and when any application is submitted by the 3rd respondent seeking for grant of patta, the petitioner will be heard before passing final orders. Page3 of 6

¶4Necessarily, the petitioner has to be heard before considering any application submitted by the 3rd respondent for grant of patta in his name for the property more fully described in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition.

¶5Since no adverse order is passed against the 3rd respondent, notice to the 3rd respondent is dispensed with by this Court.

¶6This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation dated 18.03.2026.

¶7Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to issue notice to the petitioner, as and when any application is submitted by the 3rd respondent seeking for grant of patta in his name for the property more fully described in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, and only after hearing the objections of the petitioner, the 2nd respondent shall pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the application of the 3rd respondent seeking for grant of patta in his name. Page4 of 6

¶8With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 09-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RKA Page5 of 6 To

¶1The District Collector, Salem District Collectorate, Salem District.

¶2The Tahsildar, Kadayampatti Taluk office, Kadayampatti, Salem District. WPoNo.o12824oofo2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSE,oJ. RKA WPoNo.o12824oofo2026 09-04-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE G.Ravichanthiran S/o.Late.Gopal, Raja Veedhi, Chinna Tirupathi Main Road, Opposite Parameshwari Provision Store, Poosaripatti, Kadayampatti Taluk, Salem District - 636305. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Salem District Collectorate, Salem District. 2. The Tahsildar, Kadayampatti Taluk office,Kadayampatti, Salem District. 3. P.Gopal, S/o.Perumal Gounder, No.91-1/16, Pannapatti village and post, Kadayampatti Taluk, Salem District - 636 303. ..Respondent(s) Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to pass orders on the representation dated 18.03.2026 by not transferring patta in favour of 3rd respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.DR.S.Lingesh For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander,SGP For R1 & R2 ND/W -R3 Page2 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.