VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Colonel K Malaiappan (Retired) v. Union of India

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 April 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 13630/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani

Judgment

ORDER By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶2This petition has been filed for a direction, directing the 5th respondent viz The Estate Officer, Defence Estate Office, Madras Circle to dispose the recovery and eviction proceedings dated 29.12.2022 and 16.02.2023 initiated in EQ/Q11/1/MC/Dated 16.02.2023 in a time bound manner as requested by the representation dated 24.01.2026.

¶3It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is a Garrison member of the sixth respondent club which is registered under the provisions of Societies Act, 1860. Initially larger extent of land was let out to the sixth respondent and the lease was extended upto 30.11.2003, thereafter, the fifth respondent initiated eviction proceedings to evict the 6th respondent from the demised property, the Army Headquarters also sent a communication to the fifth respondent to conclude the proceedings expeditiously and the petitioner also sent a representation on 24.01.2026 for disposing the recovery and eviction proceedings, which is pending without consideration. Hence, this writ petition.

¶4The learned senior counsel for the sixth respondent club submitted that lease was between the official respondents and the sixth respondent, after expiry of the lease period, the fifth respondent initiated eviction proceedings as against the sixth respondent, however, now, there is a proposal for extension of lease pending before the first respondent, if at all, the petitioner has any grievance, he may approach the first respondent not by filing a writ petition before this Court.

¶5The learned Additional Solicitor General would submit that if there is a proposal for fresh lease deed pending on the file of the first respondent, decision may be taken by the first respondent for extension of lease after providing opportunity to the petitioner as well as the sixth respondent.

¶6Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record.

¶7Admittedly, the facts in the present case are not in dispute. The sixth respondent Club is in occupation of the lands of the official respondents, after expiry of lease period, the fifth respondent initiated eviction proceedings and the petitioner being the Garrison member of the sixth respondent club filed the instant writ petition for implementation of the eviction proceedings, however, now, the learned senior counsel for the sixth respondent club submitted that the sixth respondent has made a proposal for extension of lease. Such view of the matter, if at all, there is any grievance for the petitioner, the petitioner may approach the first respondent and the first respondent shall take a decision after providing opportunity to the petitioner as well as the sixth respondent.

¶8Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 15-04-2026 dhk Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To

1.The Secretary to Government Union Of India Ministry of Defence, Government of India, South Block, DHQ Post, New Delhi - 110 011.

2.The Chief of the Army Staff, South Block, DHQ Post, New Delhi - 110 011.

3.The Director General Defence Estates, Government of India, Ministry of Defence, Raksha Sampada Bhawan, Ulaan Baatar Marg, Delhi Cantonment, New Delhi - 110 010.

4.The General Officer Commanding, HQ Dakshin Bharath Area, Island Grounds, Chennai - 600 009.

5.The Defence Estates Officer, Government of India, Ministry of Defence, Teynampet, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 018. M.DHANDAPANI J. dhk

15-04-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Colonel K Malaiappan (retired) Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Union Of India Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, South Block, DHQ Post, New Delhi - 110 011. 2.The Chief of the Army Staff, South Block, DHQ Post, New Delhi - 110 011. 3.The Director General Defence Estates, Government of India, Ministry of Defence, Raksha Sampada Bhawan, Ulaan Baatar Marg, Delhi Cantonment, New Delhi - 110 010. 4.The General Officer Commanding, HQ Dakshin Bharath Area, Island Grounds, Chennai - 600 009. 5.The Defence Estates Officer, Government of India, Ministry of Defence, Teynampet, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 018. 6.The Madras Gymkhana Club (MGC) Island Grounds, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 018. Respondent(s) PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, directing the 5th respondent viz The Estate Officer, Defence Estate Office, Madras Circle to dispose the recovery and eviction proceedings dated 29.12.2022 and 16.02.2023 initiated in EQ/Q11/1/MC/Dated 16.02.2023 in a time bound manner as requested by the representation dated 24.01.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Zaffarullah Khan For Respondent: Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, ASG assisted by Mr.Rajesh Vivekanandan, Deputy ASG for R1 to R5 Mr.Arvind P.Dattar, Senior Counsel for Ms.A.Vidya for Viruksham Legal for R6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.