- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 15 April 2026
- Bench
- C. Saravanan
- Case no.
- WP 13660/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan
Judgment
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN & WMP.Nos.14938, 14942, 14944, 14945, 14948 & 14950 of 2026 Tvl GVS Engineering and Construction Represented by its Proprietor, G.V.Sundaravadanan No.C-102, Sandal Block, Prince Green Woods, No.66, Vanagaram Road, Chennai-600 058 ..Petitioner(s) in all WPs Vs The State Tax Officer Group -IX Intelligence-II, Office of the Joint Commissioner (ST), Chennai Intelligence -II, No.1, PAPJM Buildings, Room No.109. I Floor, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006 ..Respondent(s) in all WPs Common Prayer : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to call for the records of the Respondent in GSTIN-33AKMP55952P1Z9/ 2019-20,
GSTIN-33AKMP55952P1Z9/2020-21
& GSTIN-33AKMP55952P1Z9/2021-2022, respectively in GSTINS-CH2-247/2022-23 dated19/06/2024 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to give an opportunity of personal hearing. Page2 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Mr.P R Kumar [in all WPs] For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran Government Advocate [in all WPs] COMMON ORDER Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent in all the Writ Petitions.
¶2These Writ Petitions are being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.
¶3In these Writ Petitions, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Orders dated 19.06.2024, which were preceded by respective show cause Notices in GST DRC-01 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. Though the petitioner filed reply and sought time to reconcile the difference with the supportive documents, the respondent without giving sufficient opportunity, confirmed the proposal by the impugned Orders dated 19.06.2024. Page3 of 6
¶4It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired long before. However, the present Writ Petition has been filed only on
06.04.2026.
¶5At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 50% of the disputed tax in respect of all the impugned orders as a condition for denovo adjudication and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in all the Writ Petitions.
¶6The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an following endorsement to that effect in all the Writ Petitions which has been extracted hereunder:- "The petitioner is willing to deposit 50% of the demand"
¶7Recording the above consent given by the Petitioner, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax vide respective impugned orders in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page4 of 6
¶8Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 19.06.2024 as an addendum to the respective show cause Notices in DRC-01 preceeding the said impugned Orders.
¶9In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit.
¶10In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.
¶11Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.
¶12These Writ Petitions stand disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 15-04-2026 Page5 of 6 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order vrc To The State Tax Officer Group -IX Intelligence-II, Office of the Joint Commissioner (ST), Chennai Intelligence -II, No.1, PAPJM Buildings, Room No.109. I Floor, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006 WPoNos.13660,o13663o&o13668oofo2026 C.SARAVANAN,oJ. vrc WPoNos.13660,o13663o&o13668oofo2026 15-04-2026 Page6oofo6
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.