VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Kariakali Turmeric and Traders (P) Ltd v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 18199/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 18.12.2025 and cancel the inclusion of the name of Mrs. Rajeshwari in Patta No.1964 and patta No. 2315 in respect of Survey Nos.643/4A4 and 643/1A (Old Survey No.404A), Modakurichi Village, Erode District.

¶2The case of the petitioner is that originally the property in Survey Nos. 643/4A4 and 643/1A (Old Survey No.404A), Modakurichi Village, Erode District belongs to one Subburaya Gounder thereafter, it was settled in favour of the Smt.Devi Palaniswamy by way of registered settlement deed bearing Document No.3518 of 1969 on 29.10.1969. Subsequently, a deed of partnership was executed on 03.11.1975 and the property was surrendered to a partnership firm. The partnership firm was dissolved on 07.01.1976 and the petitioner company / "Kariakali Turmeric and Trades Private Limited", which was formed on 07.01.1976 was taken over all the assets and liabilities of the partnership firm with effect from 11.02.1976. Subsequently, it appears that the Page3 of 6 petitioner Company was struck off in the year 2018 and thereafter, it was restored in the year 2024. By taking advantage of this struck off, the patta for the subject property was illegally issued in favour of the Smt.Devi Palaniswamy. The learned counsel would submit that since the petitioner Company was restored with effect from the year 2024, the property automatically stands in the name of the Company alone therefore, the patta cannot be transferred in favour of any individuals.

¶4Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that necessary corrections will be made and new patta will be issued in favour of the petitioner, in accordance with law.

¶5I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3.

¶6It is made clear that once the property stands in the name of the Company, even if it is dissolved and struck off, the name of the owner cannot be changed. Now the petitioner / Company has been restored, the property always belongs to the Company alone and not belongs to any individuals, unless otherwise the same is disposed of in accordance with law. Page4 of 6

¶7In such being the case, it is on the part of the Official respondents to pass appropriate orders for changing the name in the patta in favour of the petitioner / Company by considering the petitioner's representation. Accordingly, this Court directs the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 18.12.2025 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by issuing patta in the name of the petitioner / Company.

¶8This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above terms. No costs. 03-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order KKN Page5 of 6 To

¶1The District Collector, Collectorate, Erode-638 011.

¶2Revenue Divisinal Officer Collectorate, Erode District.

¶3The Revenue Tahsildar, Modakurichi Taluk, Erode District. WPoNo.o18199oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMY,oJ. KKN WPoNo.o18199oofo2026 03-06-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Kariakali Turmeric & Traders (P) Ltd Rep. by its Director Sree Vidhya Murali, Having regt. Office at No.1, Nehru Street, Selambagoundanpalayam, Modakurichi, Erode- 638 104. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Collectorate, Erode- 638 011. 2. Revenue Divisinal Officer Collectorate, Erode District. 3. The Revenue Tahsildar, Modakurichi Taluk, Erode District. 4. Rajeshwari 61/30, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-06. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 18.12.2025 and cancel the inclusion of the name of Mrs. Rajeshwari in Patta No.1964 and patta No. 2315 in respect of Survey Nos.643/4A4 and 643/1A (Old Survey No.404A), Modakurichi Village, Erode District. Page2 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Ms.S.Jeya Arthi For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan Government Counsel for R1 to R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.