- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 April 2026
- Bench
- M.Dhandapani
- Case no.
- WP 15374/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani
Judgment
ORDER The impugned order passed by the first respondent under Section 14-B in TN/CHN/-I/CC-I(PDC)/D-25/1750444/REGL/2025 dated 22.07.2025, is put under challenge in the present Writ Petition.
¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side. With the consent of both sides, the present Writ Petition is taken up for hearing at the admission stage itself.
¶3It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is a registered firm under the provisions of the Private Limited Company, which engaged in the business of providing security and housekeeping services and also registered under the Employees Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and regularly complying with the provisions of the Act. In order to harass the petitioner, the first respondent has passed the impugned order of demand dated
22.07.2025 towards the provident fund damages charges for the period from
07.2018 to 02.2024 claiming a sum of Rs.27,80,879/- and based on the order of Page3 of 6 the first respondent, the second respondent is initiating action to recover the said amount and aggrieved over the same, the present Writ Petition.
¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not disputed the impugned order of the first respondent dated 22.07.2025, however seeks permission to pay the demanded amount in instalments and thus, prayed for appropriate orders.
¶5On a bare perusal, it is seen that the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition against the order passed by the first respondent under Section 14 B of the Employees Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 on
22.07.2025, despite appeal remedy is available to him. However, the petitioner is now ready to pay the demanded amount of the impugned order dated
22.07.2025 in instalments.
¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court directs the petitioner to pay the amount demanded by the first respondent through the impugned order dated 22.07.2025 in 20 instalments and also directed to pay the first instalment on or before 10.05.2026 and the remaining instalments on or before 10th of every month. On receipt of the payment of the first instalment from the petitioner, the first respondent shall defreeze the Page4 of 6 petitioner's account and it is also made clear that if any default on the petitioner in payment of the remaining instalments as agreed by him, then the respondents are at liberty to freeze the account of the petitioner as per the provisions of the Employees Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
¶7With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 24-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order DP Page5 of 6 To
¶1The Regional PF Commissioner -I Regional PF Office, 37, Royapettah High Road, Chennai-600 014
¶2The Recovery Officer Regional PF Office, 37, Royapettah High Road, Chennai-600 014 Page6 of 6
M.DHANDAPANI, J. DP 24-04-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP.Nos.16590 & 16593 of 2026 M/s. GTS Facility Management Services Pvt Ltd., Rep. By Its Regional Head, Shri, M. Yoganandam, Plot No.5, Brindavan Nagar, Valasaravakkam, Chennai-600 087 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Regional PF Commissioner -I Regional PF Office, 37, Royapettah High Road, Chennai-600 014 2. The Recovery Officer Regional PF Office, 37, Royapettah High Road, Chennai-600 014 ..Respondent(s) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the files of the 1st Respondent and to quash the impugned order No.TN/CHN/-I/CC-I(PDC)/D-25/1750444/REGL/2025 dated 22.07.2025 Diary No.697/2024 U/s.14-B. Page2 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Ms.G.Babu Rajendran For Respondent(s): Mr.P.K.Panner Selvam for EPF
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.