VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Prasanth v. Susan Mary

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 April 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL MP 6575/2026

Judgment

ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Judicial Magistrate, by order dated 07.04.2025 passed in Crl.M.P. No. 2921 of 2024, directed the petitioner to pay maintenance of Rs. 6,000/- per month to the respondent herein from the date of filing of the petition.

¶2It appears that, aggrieved by the above order, the petitioners herein have preferred an appeal in Crl.A. No. 53 of 2025. Though the criminal appeal was dismissed suo motu, the learned appellate Judge enhanced the maintenance to Rs. 25,000/- per month.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the respondent herein has not filed any cross-appeal or any separate appeal seeking enhancement of maintenance. Hence, he submits that such an order is illegal. Page3 of 5

¶4I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶5From the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court finds a prima facie case in favour of the petitioners.

¶6There shall be an order of interim stay only to the extent of enhancement of the maintenance amount, and the 1st petitioner is directed to continue to pay the amount to the respondent as already ordered by the learned Judicial Magistrate in Crl.M.P.No.2921 of 2024. The petitioner is further directed to deposit the entire arrears to the respondent, namely, maintenance at the rate of Rs.6,000/- per month from the date of filing of the maintenance petition, till the date of deposit, within a period of four weeks from today. On such deposit, the respondent herein is permitted to withdraw the same.

¶7If the above amount is not deposited within a period of four weeks from today, the interim stay granted by this Court shall stand automatically vacated without further reference to this Court. 15-04-2026 (1/2) Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order dpa Page4 of 5 To

1.The learned Judicial Magistrate, Arakkonam

2.The II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Arakkonam.

3.Susan Mary W/o Prasanth, D/o Stephen, No.511, Transformer Street, Venkatesapuram, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. CRLoMPoNo.o6575oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. dpa CRLoMPoNo.o6575oofo2026 IN CRLoRCoNO.o853oOFo2026 15-04-2026 (1/2) Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN IN CRL RC NO. 853 OF 2026 1. Prasanth S/o Arunachalam, Residing at, No.101, VGN Amidity, Kamarajar Nagar, Parthipattu, Avadi, Chennai. 2. Arunachalam S/o Chengam, Residing at, No.101, VGN Amidity, Kamarajar Nagar, Parthipattu, Avadi, Chennai. 3. Jayanthi W/o Arunachalam, Residing at, No.101, VGN Amidity, Kamarajar Nagar, Parthipattu, Avadi, Chennai. 4. Janani D/o Arunachalam, Residing at, No.101, VGN Amidity, Kamarajar Nagar, Parthipattu, Avadi, Chennai. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Page2 of 5 Susan Mary W/o Prasanth, & D/o Stephen, No.511, Transformer Street, Venkatesapuram, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. ..Respondent(s) To stay of all further proceedings in the Crl.M.P.No.2921 of 2024 in DVC.No.9 of 2024 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Arakkonam pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision Petition. For Petitioner(s): A.G.Rajan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.