VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

J.Suresh Paul, v. Kritika Jain

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 July 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
CRP 1972/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order, dated 13.02.2026 passed by the XXIV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai in I.A.No.10 of 2026 in O.S.No.2366 of 2021. Page No.2 of 5

¶2It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the petitioners that by order dated 01.04.2026 passed in this revision, the interim stay of further proceedings in O.S.No.2366 of 2021, pending before the XXIV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai was granted. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that on the very same day (i.e., on 01.04.2026), an exparte decree came to be passed in favour of the respondent/plaintiff by the XXIV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai in O.S.No.2366 of 2021. He further submitted that an application was filed by the petitioners/defendants before the XXIV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai seeking to set aside the exparte decree passed in O.S.No.2366 of 2021. After filing the application before the trial court seeking to set aside the exparte decree, the petitioners have also filed another revision before this Court in C.R.P.No.3215 of 2026 seeking stay of the decree passed by the XXIV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai on 01.04.2026 in O.S.No.2366 of 2021. By order, dated 11.06.2026 passed in C.R.P.No.3215 of 2026, this Court, after giving due consideration to the fact that in this revision, the petitioners were having the benefit of interim stay of further proceedings in O.S.No.2366 of 2021 on the file of the XXIV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai, has granted stay of execution of the decree dated 01.04.2026 passed by the XXIV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. Page No.3 of 5

¶3In view of the subsequent revision filed by the petitioners in C.R.P.No.3215 of 2026 and in view of the fact that the petitioners are having the benefit of interim stay of execution of the decree dated 01.04.2026 passed in O.S.No.2366 of 2021 by the XXIV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai, the prayer sought in this revision has now become infructuous as it got merged with the prayer sought in C.R.P.No.3215 of 2026, which is the subsequent revision filed by the petitioners.

¶4Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of as infructuous by granting liberty to the petitioners to raise all contentions in C.R.P.No.215 of 2026, which includes the grounds raised by the petitioners in this revision. No costs. 06-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order sp To The XXIV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. Page No.4 of 5 Page No.5 of 5 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. sp AND CMP No. 8810 of 2026 06-07-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE AND CMP No. 8810 of 2026 1. J.Suresh Paul 2. J.Vasantha Mani ..Petitioners Vs Kritika Jain ..Respondent Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 13.03.2026 passed by the Learned XXIV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai in I.A.No.10 of 2026 in O.S.No.2366 of 2021. For Petitioners: Mr.R.Rubesh Kumar For Respondent: Mr.T.Srikanth

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.