V.Vasanthi, v. Sheik Abdul Khader

Page1 of 8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRP No. 1982 of 2026 & CRP No. 1984 of 2026 AND CMP No. 8868 of 2026

¶1V.Vasanthi, W/o. Late E.Thirugnana Sambandam, Formerly res. at B1903, Mantri Serentiy, Kanakapura Road, Doddanakalasandra, Karnataka 560 062. Swami Naicken Street, Chintadripet,

¶2T.Sneha D/o. Late E.Thirugnana Sambandam, Formerly res. at B1903, Mantri Serentiy, Kanakapura Road, Doddanakalasandra, Karnataka 560 062. Now res. at No.74, Swami Naicken Street, Chintadripet, Chennai 600 002.

¶3T.Preethi D/o. Late E.Thirugnana Sambandam, Formerly res. at B1903, Mantri Serentiy, Kanakapura Road, Doddanakalasandra, Karnataka 560 062. Chintadripet, Chennai 600 002. ..Petitioner(s) Page2 of 8 Vs Pudupet, Chennai 600 002.

¶2S.Noorjahan Pudupet, Chennai 600 002. ..Respondent(s) CMP No. 8868 of 2026

¶1V.Vasanthi, W/o. Late E.Thirugnana Sambandam, Formerly res. at B1903, Mantri Serentiy, Kanakapura Road, Doddanakalasandra, Karnataka 560 062. Swami Naicken Street, Chintadripet,

¶2T.Sneha D/o. Late E.Thirugnana Sambandam, Formerly res. at B1903, Mantri Serentiy, Kanakapura Road, Doddanakalasandra, Karnataka 560 062. Chintadripet, Chennai 02.

¶3T.Preethi D/o. Late E.Thirugnana Sambandam, Formerly res. at B1903, Mantri Serentiy, Kanakapura Road, Doddanakalasandra, Karnataka 560 062.Now res. at No.74, Chintadripet, Chennai 02. Page3 of 8 ..Petitioner(s) Vs Pudupet,

¶2S.Noorjahan Pudupet, ..Respondent(s) CRP No. 1984 of 2026

¶1V. Vasanthi W/o. Late E.Thirugnana Sambandam, Formerly res. at B1903, Mantri Serentiy, Kanakapura Road, Doddanakalasandra, Karnataka 560 062. Chintadripet, Chennai 02.

¶2T. Sneha D/o. Late E.Thirugnana Sambandam, Formerly res. at B1903, Mantri Serentiy, Kanakapura Road, Doddanakalasandra, Karnataka 560 062. Now res. at No.74, Swami Naicken Street, Chintadripet, Chennai 02.

¶3T. Preethi D/o. Late E.Thirugnana Sambandam, Formerly res. at B1903, Mantri Serentiy, Kanakapura Road, Doddanakalasandra, Karnataka 560 062. Page4 of 8 Chintadripet, Chennai 02. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Pudupet,

¶2S. Noorjahan Pudupet, ..Respondent(s) To set aside the order and decreetal order dated 10.02.2026 in I.A.No.5 of 2025 in O.S.No.6675 of 2024 on the file of the Honble III Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. CRP No. 1984 of 2026 To set aside the order and decreetal order dated 10.02.2026 in I.A.No.6 of 2025 in O.S.No.6675 of 2024 on the file of the Honble III Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. CMP No. 8868 of 2026 To grant interim stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.6675 of 2024 on the file of the Honble III Additional City Civil Court, Chennai pending disposal of the above Revision Petition. Page5 of 8 For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.J.Parthasarathy For Respondent(s): COMMON ORDER These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed to set aside the orders and decreetal order dated 10.02.2026 in I.A.Nos.5 and 6 of 2025 in O.S.No.6675 of 2024 on the file of the III Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Trial Court has not given sufficient opportunity to cross examine P.W1 and despite seeking time, without granting time on 05.11.2025, closed the cross examination of P.W.1 and posted the suit for defendant evidence. Despite the aforesaid applications were filed immediately without any delay, to reopen plaintiff side evidence and recall P.W.1, the Trial Court dismissed the same which is contrary to the mandate under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC which enables the Court to recall witness at any stage of the suit and the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in 2011 (11) SCC 275.

¶3On perusal of the records and submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, it reveals that without giving sufficient opportunity to the petitioners/defendants for further cross examination of P.W.1, the evidence of P.W1 was closed on 05.11.2025. Now, the defendants have come forward to Page6 of 8 cross examine P.W.1 to defend the case. However, the Trial Court dismissed the same holding that despite sufficient opportunity was given, the petitioners have not utilized the same. However, the right of cross examination on the side of the defendants/petitioners cannot be rejected since it is vital factors to decide the case on merits. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant one more opportunity to the petitioners to cross examine the P.W.1, thereby the orders dated 10.02.2026 made in I.A. Nos. 5 and 6 of 2025 passed by the Court below stand set aside.

¶4It is made clear that the petitioner shall cross examine P.W.1 within a period of one week without asking unnecessary adjournments. Further, the Trial Court is directed to dispose of the case as early as possible and both parties are directed to cooperate with the Trial Court proceedings to complete the same at the earliest.

¶5With the aforesaid directions, the Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 06-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Lbm Page7 of 8 To Pudupet,

¶2S.Noorjahan Pudupet, CRPoNo.o1982oofo2026 T.V.THAMILSELVIoJ. Lbm CRPoNo.o1982oofo2026o&oCRPoNo.o1984oofo2026 AND CMPoNo.o8868oofo2026o 06-04-2026 Page8oofo8