Bullmenn Motors v. Assistant Commissioner St

ORDER Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondent.

¶2With the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent, this writ petition is being disposed of at the time of admission.

¶3In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 08.12.2025 passed under Section 73 of the respective GST enactments for the tax period 2021-2022.

¶4By the impugned order, the demand proposed in the Show Cause Notice in DRC-01 dated 24.09.2025 was confirmed due to the absence of a reply from the petitioner to the said notice.

¶5It is noticed that the petitioner has admitted that an application was filed before the respondent for rectification of the impugned order, which was rejected by an Order dated 23.03.2026.

¶6The learned counsel for the petitioner appears through video conference and submits that the petitioner is willing to deposit 10% of the disputed tax confirmed by the impugned order, and therefore, the learned counsel seeks one opportunity for de novo adjudication.

¶7The Learned Government Advocate for the respondent would submit that he has no objection to the same, subject to the petitioner depositing the aforementioned amount.

¶8Recording the above consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Learned Government Advocate for the respondent, the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a fresh order on merits, subject to the petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax, either in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register, within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶9Within such time, the petitioner shall also file a reply to the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 24.09.2025, along with the requisite documents to substantiate their case, treating the impugned Order dated

08.12.2025 as an addendum to the said notice.

¶10Subject to the petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the respondent shall proceed to pass fresh order on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months of such reply / pre-deposit.

¶11It is needless to state that, before passing any such order, the petitioner shall be heard.

¶12The attachment of the petitioner's bank account shall also stand automatically raised/vacated, subject to the petitioner complying with the above stipulations.

¶13It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted, subject to the deposit of 10% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned order.

¶14In case the petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the respondent is at liberty to proceed against the petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this writ petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶15This writ petition stands disposed of with the above directions. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

09.04.2026 raja To The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Trichy Road Circle, Coimbatore - 641 018.

C.SARAVANAN, J. raja

09.04.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.14906 & 14907 of 2026 Bullmenn Motors, Rep by its Partner SF-1, Parsn Anira, Nanjundapuram Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore - 641 036 ... Petitioner Vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST), Trichy Road Circle, Coimbatore - 641 018. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order in Reference No. ZD331225121961P dated 08.12.2025 passed by the respondent along with annexures and quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.R.Sri Visvapriya For Respondent : Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran Government Advocate