Rajini v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 2 and 3 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application dated 24.02.2026 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner had submitted an online application on 24.02.2026 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Mr. V. Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) accepts notice on behalf of the fourth respondent.

¶4This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

¶5No prejudice will be caused to the respondents 2 and 3 if the said authorities are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections if any from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom they deem it fit. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners and also to any other party, whom they deem it fit to enquire.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 2 and 3 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the respondents 2 and 3, the fourth respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs. 16-04-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To

1.The Revenue Divisional officer Tiruvannamalai

2.The Tahsildar Tiruvannamalai Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District

3.The head Surveyor Tiruvannamalai Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District

4.The Sub Inspector of police Thachampattu Police statio Tiruvannamalai District ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

16-04-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. Rajini S/o Velu, No 215 (1) Main Road, Pavupattu Village, Tiruvannamalai Taluk and District Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Revenue Divisional officer Tiruvannamalai 2.The Tahsildar Tiruvannamalai Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District 3.The head Surveyor Tiruvannamalai Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District 4.The Sub Inspector of police Thachampattu Police statio Tiruvannamalai District Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to survey and measure petitioners field boundaries for a properties comprised in Old No 88/1 and new S. no 88/1A1 at measuring to totally an extent of 0.06 cents situated at pavupattu village, Tiruvannamalai Taluk and District with 4th respondents police aid and subsequenlty after sub division transfer the patta vide No 385 on the file of 2nd respondent in petitioners name For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Subash For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt.Advocate For R1 to R3 Mr. V. Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R4