VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Jansons Textile Processors v. The Commercial Tax Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 April 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 14174/2026

Judgment

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN AND WMP No. 15413 of 2026 Jansons Textile Processors (now known as Janson Industries Limited), (Represented by its Managing Partner Mr. T.S. Natarajan) 68/1-A, Namkkal Road, Tiruchengode ..Petitioner in both WPs Vs The Commercial Tax officer Tiruchengode Nagar circle Tiruchengode Town ..Respondent in both WPs Prayer in W.P.No.14174 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the files of the Respondent herein in Proceeding TNGST NO 3181796/2004-05 dated 05.08.2025 reiterating his order dated 05.06.2024, quash the same. Prayer in W.P.No.14177 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent herein to dispose the application for rectification dated 29.01.2026 filed by the Petitioners. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.A.Parthasarathy in both WPs For Respondent(s): Ms. Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Advocate in both WPs Page2 of 5 COMMON ORDER Ms. Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

¶3The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 50% of the disputed tax confirmed by the impugned order dated 05.06.2024 / 05.08.2025, in order to seek liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which is extracted hereunder:- " The petitioner is consent to deposit 50% of the tax amount."

¶4Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority, subject to the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page3 of 5

¶5In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulation, the Appellate Authority shall proceed to consider the appeal and pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, without reference to limitation on its own turn.

¶6In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondents are at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶7Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondents shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶8In view of the order passed in W.P.No.14174 of 2026, no further orders are required to be passed in W.P.No.14177 of 2026.

¶9In the result,

(i) W.P.No.14174 of 2026 stands disposed of with the above observations.

(ii) W.P.No.14177 of 2026 stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 15-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Page4 of 5 To The Commercial Tax officer Tiruchengode Nagar circle Tiruchengode Town. Page5 of 5 C.SARAVANAN J. av AND WMP No. 15413 of 2026 15-04-2026

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.