VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

C.Jothi v. National Highways Authority of India

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 April 2026
Bench
S. M. Subramaniamauthor, K. Surender
Case no.
WP 13566/2023

Judgment

O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Writ of Mandamus has been instituted, seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to initiate action against the 4th Respondent under Section 26 of the Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 to remove the encroachment made by the 4th respondent in terms of the communication issued in NHAI/14033/1.A / 2009/PIU-Chennai / 1269 dated 08.07.2022 by the 1st Respondent.

¶2The 5th respondent is suo motu impleaded as party to the lis. Learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the 5th respondent.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that encroachment in National Highways Road is causing obstruction to free flow of traffic and road users. Thus, a complaint has been lodged before the competent authority. Since no action has been initiated, the present writ petition has been instituted. Page3 of 4

¶4It is needless to state that under the provisions of National Highways Act, Authorities are bound to be vigilant in safeguarding National Highways Roads, which should be kept free from encroachments and usage of public. Photographs enclosed along with the writ proceedings would show that encroachments are made in the Highways property and footpath.

¶5In view of the above allegations set out in the affidavit, respondents 1, 2 and 5 are directed to inspect, survey and identify encroachments, if any and thereafter, initiate enforcement action to remove all encroachments, by following procedures as contemplated under the relevant Statute and Rules in force. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above observations and directions, the present Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 16-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order AR Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J. AND K.SURENDER,J. AR To:

1.The Project Direction, National Highways Authority of India PIU-Chennai, No.DP-34, Sri Towers South Phase, 3rd Floor, SP Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600 032.

2.The project Officer National Highways Authority of India, PIU-Kancheepuram, No.7/16, Govindarajan Street, Tambaram West, Chennai-600 045.

3.The President, Thiruverkadu Municipality Thiruverkadu, Thiruvallur District.

4.The Divisional Engineer (NH) Koyambedu, Chennai-600 010. W.P.No.13566 of 2023 16-04-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER W.P.No.13566 of 2023 AND W.M.P.NO.13241 OF 2023 C.Jothi ..Petitioner Vs 1. National Highways Authority of India Rep. by its Project Director, PIU- Chennai No.DP- 34, Sri Towers South Phase, 3rd Floor, SP Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai- 600 032. 2. The project Officer National Highways Authority of India, PIU- Kancheepuram, No.7/16, Govindarajan Street, Tambaram West, Chennai- 600 045. 3. Thiruverkadu Municipality Rep by its President,Thiruverkadu, Thiruvallur District. 4. B.Saravanan 5. The Divisional Engineer (NH) Koyambedu, Chennai-600 010. ..Respondent(s) (R5 suo – motu impleaded by this Court) Prayer: Directing the 2nd Respondent to initiate action against the 4th Respondent under Section 26 of the control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 to remove the encroachment made by the 4th Page2 of 4 respondent in terms of the communication issued in NHAI / 14033 / 1.A / 2009 / PIU -chennai / 1269 dated 08.07.2022 by the 1st Respondent. For Petitioner: Mr.M.Ilansezhiyan For Respondent(s): Mr.Su.Srinivasan, Standing Counsel for R1 & R2 Mr.P.Srinivas, Standing Counsel for R3 R4 – No Appearance Mr.T.Arun Kumar, AGP for R5 *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.