VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

G.Paranthaman v. The State

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 April 2026
Bench
The Chief Justice, G.Arul Muruganauthor
Case no.
WP 16131/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow The Chief JusticeFollow G.Arul Murugan

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Petition styled as Public Interest Litigation seeks a direction to the official respondents to consider and take necessary action based on petitioner's representation dated 19.03.2026 requesting to protect and safeguard the watercourse (Nilaviyal Odai) comprised in Survey No.433/1C, situate at Ananthapuram Revenue Village, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District admeasuring an extent of 0.7.00 ares (0.18 cents).

¶2Learned State Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that in compliance with the earlier orders of this Court, the 4th respondent vide order dated

25.10.2025 has held that encroachments in the form of trees need not be removed and the encroachments in the form of paddy cultivation were removed on 10.03.2026. He submits that as against the aforesaid order dated 25.10.2025, the 8th respondent has filed an appeal before the second respondent and the same is pending consideration. He would, therefore, submit that any further action whatsoever shall be based on the outcome of the pending appeal. Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned State Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim application stands closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.)

27.04.2026 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No sra THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND

G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.

(sra) To

¶1The Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶2The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶3The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Office, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶4The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO Office, Arni Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶5The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶6The Forest Officer, Santhavasal Range, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶7The Village Administrative Officer, VAO Office, Ananthapuram Village, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.

27.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and WMP No.17360 of 2026 G.Paranthaman .. Petitioner -vs- 1. The State Rep. By its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2. The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Tiruvannamalai District. 3. The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Office, Tiruvannamalai District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO Office, Arni Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. 5. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. 6. The Forest Officer, Santhavasal Range, Tiruvannamalai District. 7. The Village Administrative Officer, VAO Office, Ananthapuram Village, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. 8. Krishnan .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the official respondents to consider and take necessary action based on petitioner's representation dated 19.03.2026 requesting to protect and safeguard the watercourse (Nilaviyal Odai) comprised in Survey No.433/1C, situate at Ananthapuram Revenue Village, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District admeasuring an extent of 0.7.00 ares (0.18 cents) within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Thirumoorthy For Respondents : Mr.A.Edwin Prabakar State Govt. Pleader for RR 1 to 7 * * *

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.