- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 April 2025
- Bench
- M. Sundar, S Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi
- Case no.
- WP 14712/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow M. SundarFollow S Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi
Judgment
ORDER [made by M. SUNDAR, J.] This order will now dispose of the captioned 'writ petition' ['WP' for the sake of brevity].
¶2Mr. R. Gokulakrishnan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner, is before us.
¶3Adverting to a representation dated 01.04.2025 (date wrongly stated in the representation as 01.03.2025) addressed by the writ petitioner to R2 (Tahsildar), learned counsel for writ petitioner submitted that there is alleged encroachment on '20 foot wide road Page Nos.2/8 which is on the west side of the writ petitioner's property situate in old Survey No.289/1B2 and new Survey No.289/1A1B in plot no. 18 measuring an extent of 2,720 sq.ft. in Town Survey Field Nos.32 & 42, Ward I, Block 27, Srinivasa Nagar, Selayur, Tambaram Taluk, Chengalpattu District' [hereinafter 'said land' for the sake of convenience and clarity] by RR 4 to 8 before us. To be noted, RR 4 to 8 are private respondents.
¶4Considering the obtaining position, we are of the view that the captioned WP can be disposed of by ordering notice to official respondents (RR 1 - 3) and putting in a safety valve / adequate protection qua alleged encroachers i.e., RR 4 to 8.
¶5Issue notice to official respondents, i.e., RR 1 to 3.
¶6Mr. T.K. Saravanan, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for RR 1 and 2 and Mr. A. Gokulakrishnan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice for R3. Page Nos.3/8
¶7In the light of what has been alluded to supra and considering the limited scope of the captioned WP, with the consent of both sides, captioned WP was taken up.
¶8It was submitted by learned Additional Government Pleader that G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022 has been put in place, wherein and whereby Divisional Monitoring Committee, District Monitoring Committee and State Steering Committee have been constituted inter alia for a single point reporting / monitoring system qua Government lands.
¶9In the light of the narrative thus far, we deem it appropriate to refer the matter to the Divisional Monitoring Committee headed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram qua G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022. Page Nos.4/8
¶10This Court directs the jurisdictional Divisional Monitoring Committee to examine if there is encroachment qua said land. The Divisional Monitoring Committee shall also ensure that adequate and ample opportunity is given to persons concerned, more particularly alleged encroachers (RR 4 to 8) before taking a call. In this regard, we are acutely conscious that the matter is being disposed of in Admission Board without notice to alleged encroachers and therefore, this safety valve is put in place. To be noted, all the rights and contentions of alleged encroachers are preserved for being raised before the Committee concerned which shall consider the same on their own merits and in accordance with law untrammelled by this proceedings in this Court.
¶11The Divisional Monitoring Committee qua G.O. (Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022, shall (if it comes to the conclusion that there is encroachment) report the encroachment for further action (for removal of encroachment which again shall be after giving adequate and ample opportunity to alleged encroachers). The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of 12 weeks from today i.e., by 17.07.2025. Page Nos.5/8
¶12It is open to the writ petitioner and or anyone concerned with this matter to come to this Court on the same issue even with a similar / same prayer if there is any change of circumstances.
¶13We make it clear that we have not expressed any view or opinion as to whether there is encroachment or not qua said land as it turns on facts and it is for the Divisional Monitoring Committee to take a call on this aspect of the matter. We also make it clear that this exercise will not apply to patta land and it will apply only to public land, if there is any encroachment in public land.
¶14Captioned WP is disposed of with the aforementioned observations and directives in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S., J.) (K.G.T., J.)
24.04.2025 cad Index : NC : Page Nos.6/8 To:
¶1The Commissioner Tambaram City Municipality Corporation West Tambaram Chennai 600 045
¶2The Tahsildar Tambaram Tahsildar Office Chengalpattu District
¶3The Inspector of Police Selaiyur Police Station Selaiyur Chennai 600 073
¶4The Revenue Divisional Officer Tambaram Chennai Page Nos.7/8 W.P.,No.14712,of,2025 M.SUNDAR,(J. and K.(GOVINDARAJAN(THILAKAVADI,(J. cad W.P.,No.14712,of,2025
24.04.2025 PageoNos.8/8
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI W.P.No.14712 of 2025 N.Sundara Rajan Rep. by Power of Attorney AR.Jayaganesh Petitioner vs. 1. The Commissioner Tambaram City Municipality Corporation West Tambaram, Chennai 600 045 2. The Tahsildar Tambaram Tahsildar Office Chengalpattu District 3. The Inspector of Police Selaiyur Police Station Selaiyur, Chennai 600 073 4. Philomonaseeli 5. Anand Raj 6. Jeya Deepan 7. Jone @ Anbuselvi 8. Queen Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to Page Nos.1/8 remove the encroachment on 20 foot wide road west of the petitioner's property situated in old survey No.289/1B2 and new survey No.289/1A1B in plot no. 18 measuring an extent of 2,720 sq.ft. in Town Survey Field Nos.32 & 42, Ward I, Block 27 with the aid of the 3rd respondent. For petitioner Mr. R. Gokulakrishnan For RR 1 & 2 Mr. T.K. Saravanan Addl. Govt. Pleader For R3 Mr. A. Gokulakrishnan Addl. Public Prosecutor
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.