VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ms Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd v. Abhishek Kumar Singh

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 June 2026
Bench
K.Kumaresh Babuauthor
Case no.
Arb Appln 748/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K.Kumaresh Babu

Judgment

O R D E R This application has been filed to grant an order appointing as rece1ver of Mr.Manoj Kumar Gupta, currently designated as Assistant Receivable Manager of M/ S.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited having his officeat Chola Crest, C54 & 55, Super B-4, Thiru-Vi-Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600032, to visit the respondents premises, other areas which isoccupied by the Respondent and any other premises of the Respondent along with Local police protection to break open if necessary, and to seize and take custody of the vehicle hypothecated with applicant being Model - BOLERO NEO N8 WHITE, Chassis No. MA1NA2XZXP6A33015, Engine No. XZP6A13533, and bearing Registration No.BR45Q1383 with all accessories fitted to the asset specifically described in the scheduleto the Judges Summons and hand them over to the applicant pending final adjudication of the disputes between parties through arbitration.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the applicant had provided a loan to the respondent for the purchase of the vehicle Page3 of 6 Model - BOLERO NEO N8 WHITE, Chassis No. MA1NA2XZXP6A33015, Engine No. XZP6A13533, and bearing Registration No.BR45Q1383 and also a Loan Agreement had also been entered by the respondent with the applicant on

10.02.2023. He would contend that there is some unremained installments that are to be made by the respondent and that in spite of repeated demands, the respondent had failed to regularize the default and had continued to not pay the EMIs. He would further submit that considering the facts of the case, the applicant had sought for an appointment of a party receiver which would be more effective.

¶3In spite of notice having been served on the respondent, the respondent had neither chosen to appear before this Court in person nor is being represented by a counsel. The name of the respondent has been reflected in the cause-list. He was called absent and set ex parte.

¶4I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and also perused the materials placed on record.

¶5This Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a prima facie case for appointment of a Party Receiver. Page4 of 6

¶6Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, this Court is satisfied with the prayer sought for in this application and in fine, Mr.Manoj Kumar Gupta, currently designated as Assistant Receivable Manager as Party Receiver to seize and take possession of the asset Model - BOLERO NEO N8 WHITE, Chassis No. MA1NA2XZXP6A33015, Engine No. XZP6A13533, and bearing Registration No.BR45Q1383 from the respondent or any place belonging to the respondent or wherever found and with whomsoever it is found. It is also made clear that if police help is required, the Party Receiver shall make a request to the local police station within whose jurisdiction the vehicle is found and on such request being made, the Station House Officer shall send the Police Personnel along with the Party Receiver to seize the vehicle. If break open of a lock is required, the Party Receiver shall do so in the presence of the police personnel who will counter sign the record evidencing the break open of the lock and to re-lock the premises. If the Party Receiver finds any difficulty with the jurisdictional police, he is at liberty to approach Superintendent of Police, who shall provide all necessary assistance to him at the time of seizure of the vehicle.

¶7If the respondent make good the unpaid installments or makes substantial payments of the dues to be paid to the satisfaction of the applicant, the applicant shall return the asset in the condition it was re-possessed. Page5 of 6

¶8With the above terms, this application stands disposed of. 25-06-2026 Maya Page6 of 6

K.KUMARESH BABU, J. Maya Dated : 25-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited, Chola Crest, C54-55 & Super B – 4, Thiru-vi-ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Abhishek Kumar Singh Ward No.3 Village Parasi, Auri Anpara, Sohbhadra, Uttar Pradesh-231225. ..Respondent(s) Prayer Arbitration Application under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Section 9(1)(ii)(c) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to grant an order appointing as receiver of Mr.Manoj Kumar Gupta, currently designated as Assistant Receivable Manager of M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited having his officeat Chola Crest, C54 & 55, Super B-4, Thiru-Vi-Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600032, to visit the respondents premises, other areas which isoccupied by the Respondent and any other premises of the Respondentalong with Local police protection to break open if necessary, and to seizeand take custody of the vehicle hypothecated with applicant being Model - BOLERO NEO N8 WHITE, Chassis No. MA1NA2XZXP6A33015, Engine No. XZP6A13533, and bearing Registration No.BR45Q1383 with all accessories fitted to the asset specifically described in the scheduleto the Judges Summons and hand them over to the applicant pending finaladjudication of the disputes between parties through arbitration. Page2 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Ashok Kumar for M/s.SAN LAW Partners LLP ****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.