- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 June 2026
- Bench
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Case no.
- WP 17121/2026
Judgment
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP Nos. 17121, 17439, 17823, 17929, 17931 and 17946 of 2026 and 17204 of 2026 and 17275 of 2026 and W.M.P. Nos.18410, 18411, 18703, 18708, 19147, 19148, 19262, 19264, 19263, 19265, 19278 and 19279 of 2026 and 18481 and 18482 of 2026 and 18553 and 18554 of 2026 Ms Mahindra Holidays and Resorts India Limited, Mahindra Towers, 2nd Floor,17/18, Patullas Road, Chennai-600 002. ..Petitioner in all WPs Vs
¶1The customs Excise and service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Shastri Bhavan, 26, Haddows Road, Annexe, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 006.
¶2The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Chennai North Commissionerate
¶3The Assistant Commissioner, Office of the Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Nungambakkam Division, Chennai North Commissionerate, GST Annexe Building V Floor, 26/1, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034. Page2 of 6
¶4The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Appeals I) Office of the Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Appeals I) ..Respondents in all WPs W.P.No.17121 of 2026: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for records relating to the impugned Final Order No. 41252/2025 dated 07.11.2025 passed in ST/40013/2021 issued by the 1st Respondent herein and quash the same and consequentially direct the 3rd Respondent to grant refund. W.P. No. 17439 of 2026: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for records relating to the impugned Final Order No. 41258/2025 dated 07.11.2025 passed in ST/40890/2023 issued by the 1st W.P. No. 17823 of 2026: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for records relating to the impugned Final Order No. 41256/2025 dated 07.11.2025 passed in Appeal Number ST/40484/2021 issued by the 1st Respondent herein and quash the same and consequentially direct the 3rd Respondent to grant refund. Page3 of 6 W.P. No. 17929 of 2026: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for records relating to the impugned Final Order No. 41251/2025 dated 07.11.2025 passed in ST/40012/2021 issued by the 1st W.P. No. 17931 of 2026: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for records relating to the impugned Final Order No. 41255/2025 dated 07.11.2025 passed in Appeal Number ST/40483/2021 issued by the 1st Respondent herein and quash the same and consequentially direct the 3rd Respondent to grant refund. W.P. No. 17946 of 2026: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for records relating to the impugned Final Order No. 41254/2025 dated 07.11.2025 passed in ST/40482/2021 issued by the 1st W.P. No. 17204 of 2026: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for records relating to the impugned Final Order No. 41250/2025 dated 07.11.2025 passed in Appeal No.ST/40011/2021 issued by the 1st Respondent herein and quash the same and consequentially direct the 3rd Respondent to grant refund. W.P. No. 17275 of 2026: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for records relating to the impugned Final Order No. 41253/2025 dated 07.11.2025 passed in ST/40014/2021 issued by the 1st Page4 of 6 For Petitioner: Mr.P.V.Balasubramaniam, Senior Counsel for M/sHarish Bindumadhavan in all WPs For Respondents: Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Senior Panel Counsel in all WPs COMMON ORDER Orders issued by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) are challenged in these writ petitions.
¶2Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel, accepts notice for all the respondents. He raises the preliminary objection that only a statutory appeal, by way of a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, is maintainable and not a writ petition. He relies inter alia on the judgment of this Court in M/s.Thiruchitrambalam Projects Ltd. vs. Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (2016(7)TMI 472).
¶3Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to take the papers back and convert the writ petitions into memoranda of appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. He relies on an earlier order of this Court dated
14.10.2025 in W.P.No.38613 of 2025. Page5 of 6
¶4Upon considering Section 35G of the Central Excise Act and the contentions of learned senior standing counsel, the objection raised by him is valid.
¶5Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of by permitting the petitioner to take back the papers from the Registry and take necessary measures to re-file the same as Civil Miscellaneous Appeals. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
01.06.2026 Index: Yes/No mmi To
¶1The Customs Excise and service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Shastri Bhavan, 26, Haddows Road, Annexe, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 006
¶2The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Chennai North Commissionerate, 26/1, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
¶3The Assistant Commissioner Office of the Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Nungambakkam Division, Chennai North Commissionerate, GST Annexe Building V Floor, 26/1, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai – 600 034.
¶4The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Appeals I) Office of the Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Appeals I) WPoNo.o17121oofo2026oetc., SENTHILKUMAR(RAMAMOORTHY(J. mmi WP(Nos.(17121,(17439,(17823,(17929,( 17931,(17946,((17204(and(17275(of(2026
01.06.2026 Page6oofo6
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.