VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

K.Chandrasekar v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OFF- Reporting Compliance
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 15212/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated 02.03.2026.

¶2Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 02.03.2026 before the respondents, requesting to survey and fix the boundary stones at the subject property. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition. Page2 of 6

¶4In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of within a period of 4 weeks and hence, she requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

¶5Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶6In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the concerned respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 02.03.2026 and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶7It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondent for conducting survey and laying boundary stones at the subject land. If there is any dispute with regard to the possession over the said property, the same has to be decided only by way of filing a suit before an appropriate Civil Court.

¶8If any police protection is required at the time of conducting survey, the official respondents are granted liberty to avail the same by approaching the Page3 of 6 5th respondent. In such case, the 5th respondent shall provide all necessary assistance to the official respondents till the completion of survey at the subject land.

¶9With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost.

¶10Post this matter for reporting compliance on 07.07.2026. 02-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nsa To

¶1The District Collector Collectors Office,

¶2The Tahsildar Tahsildars Office, Thalaivasal Town and Taluk,

¶3The Taluk Head Surveyor, Tahsildar office, Thalaivasal Town and Taluk,

¶4the Village Administrative Officer, Veeraganur Village and post, Thalaivasal Taluk, Page4 of 6

¶5The Inspector of Police Veeraganur Police Station, Page5 of 6 WPoNo.o15212oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o15212oofo2026 02-06-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY K.Chandrasekar S/o. Kandasamy, 1st Agraharam Street, pethanaickenpalayam, Attur Taluk, Salem District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Collectors Office, 2. The Tahsildar Tahsildars Office, Thalaivasal Town and Taluk, 3. The Taluk Head Surveyor, Tahsildar office, Thalaivasal Town and Taluk, 4. The Village Administrative Officer, Veeraganur Village and post, Thalaivasal Taluk, 5. The Inspector of Police Veeraganur Police Station, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to consider the Page1 of 6 Petitioners application dated 02.03.2026 seeking to Survey and fix the boundaries of the Petitioners land in S.F. No.543/1B to an extent of 1-95.50 acres at Veeraganur Village, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District by availing the assistance of the 5th Respondent on merits with the time limit fixed by this Honble Court For Petitioner(s): Mr.L. Mouli For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Govt's counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.