VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

K.Sekar v. Amaravathi Ammal(Died)

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 March 2026
Bench
K.Kumaresh Babuauthor
Case no.
CRP 1594/2020

Judgment

ORDER The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 27.01.2020 made in I.A.No.16 of 2019 in OS.No.3 of 2019 on the Special Subordinate Judge for LAOP. cases, Vellore District.

¶2Heard Mr.N.Krishnakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶3In spite of notice having been served on respondents 1 and 2 and their names also having been printed in the cause list today, there is no representation on the side of the respondents 1 and 2.

¶4In spite of notice having been served and a learned counsel, who had also entered appearance on behalf of respondents 3 and 4, there is no representation on the side of the respondents 3 and 4 either in person or through a counsel. Page3 of 5

¶5This revision petition has been filed, seeking to set aside the ex parte decree that had been made against the petitioner in a Partition suit. The petitioner, who had been arrayed as 7th defendant, claims to have purchased the suit property from the 4th defendant in the suit to an extent of 26 cents.

¶6It is also brought to the notice that a preliminary decree had been passed, entitling the parties to 1/6th share each. The suit relates to various Survey Numbers at Thellur village at Vellore District. Even assuming that as per the 1/6th share that was available to the plaintiffs and the defendants 2 to 4, the fourth defendant sold 26 cents to the petitioner.

¶7In such an event, in respect of ex parte preliminary decree passed, this Court is of the view that the petitioner can be permitted to agitate the final decree proceedings and take out necessary application to allot the extent of land that had been sold by the 4th defendant in his favour from and out of his share.

¶8In such view of the matter, the Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to agitate his right to retain the said 26 cents, which has been sold by the 4th defendant from and out of the share in the suit schedule properties. Page4 of 5

¶9No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 12-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order kak To The Special Subordinate Judge for LAOP. cases, Vellore District. CRPoNo.o1594oofo2020 K.KUMARESHoBABU,oJ. kak CRPoNo.o1594oofo2020 12-03-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and C.M.P.No.9697 of 2020 Sekar ..Petitioner(s) Vs Amaravathi Ammal(died) 1. K.Dhanabaggiyammal 2. R.Amsaveni 3. K.Nagarajan 4. K.Arularasan ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 27.01.2020 made in I.A.No.16 of 2019 in OS.No.3 of 2019 on the Special Subordinate Judge for LAOP. cases, Vellore District. Page2 of 5 For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Krishnakumar For M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For Respondent(s): No appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.