VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

S.Sivaji v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 June 2025
Bench
M. Sundarauthor, Hemant Chandangoudar
Case no.
WP 17784/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M. SundarFollow Hemant Chandangoudar

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by M. SUNDAR, J.] This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Petition' ['WP' for the sake of brevity].

¶2Mr.S.Nagarajan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner, is before us. Page Nos.2/8

¶3Adverting to a representation dated 04.11.2023, from the writ petitioner, learned counsel for writ petitioner submitted that there is alleged encroachment in 'Government land in Survey Number 404/16 at Peria Korukkai & Post, Thiruthuraipoondi Taluk, Tiruvarur District' [hereinafter 'said land' for the sake of convenience and clarity] by R3 before us. To be noted, R3 is a private respondent.

¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case in juxtaposition with 'G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022' {hereinafter 'said GO' for the sake of convenience} which puts in place a removal of encroachment procedure inter-alia giving opportunity to alleged encroacher, we are of the view that the captioned WP can be disposed of by ordering notice to official respondents [R1 & R2] and putting in a safety valve / adequate protection qua alleged encroacher i.e., R3.

¶5Issue notice to official respondents, i.e., R1 & R2. Page Nos.3/8

¶6Mr.M.S.Arasakumar, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for R1 and R2.

¶7In the light of what has been alluded to supra and considering the limited scope of the captioned WP, with the consent of both sides, captioned WP was taken up.

¶8It was submitted by learned State counsel that said GO has been put in place, wherein and whereby Divisional Monitoring Committee, District Monitoring Committee and State Steering Committee have been constituted inter alia for a single point reporting / monitoring system qua Government lands.

¶9This Court suo-motu impleads the Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Mannargudi, as R4 in the captioned WP. Mr.M.S.Arasakumar, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for R4. Page Nos.4/8

¶10In the light of the narrative thus far, we deem it appropriate to refer the matter to the Divisional Monitoring Committee headed by R4 qua said GO.

¶11This Court directs the jurisdictional Divisional Monitoring Committee to examine if there is encroachment qua said land.

¶12The Divisional Monitoring Committee qua said GO shall (if it comes to the conclusion that there is encroachment) report the encroachment to appropriate authorities concerned for further action (for removal of encroachment). In this regard, we are acutely conscious that the matter is being disposed of in Admission Board without notice to alleged encroacher and therefore, this safety valve is put in place. To be noted, all the rights and contentions of alleged encroacher are preserved for being raised before the Committee concerned which shall consider the same on their own merits and in accordance with law untrammelled by this proceedings in this Court. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of 16 weeks from today i.e., by 22.09.2025. Page Nos.5/8

¶13It is open to the writ petitioner and or anyone concerned with this matter to come to this Court on the same issue even with a similar / same prayer if there is any change of circumstances.

¶14We make it clear that we have not expressed any view or opinion as to whether there is encroachment or not qua said land as it turns on facts and it is for the Divisional Monitoring Committee to take a call on this aspect of the matter. We also make it clear that this exercise will not apply to patta land and it will apply only to public land, if there is any encroachment in public land.

¶15Captioned WP is disposed of with the aforementioned observations and directives in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S.J.,) (H.C.J.,)

02.06.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non-speaking mk Page Nos.6/8 To

¶1The District Collector Tiruvarur District Tiruvarur.

¶2The Tahsildar Taluk Office Thiruthuraipoondi Tiruvarur District.

¶3The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office Mannargudi. Page Nos.7/8 M.SUNDAR, J., and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., mk

02.06.2025 Page Nos.8/8

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR S.Sivaji S/o.Sivaperumal ... Petitioner vs. 1. The District Collector Tiruvarur District Tiruvarur. 2. The Tahsildar Taluk Office Thiruthuraipoondi Tiruvarur District. 3. Sivachidambaram S/o.Thangavel 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office Mannargudi. Respondents * R4 suo-motu impleaded vide order dated 02.06.2025 Page Nos.1/8 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 2 herein to remove the encroachment made by the 3rd respondent herein in the 13 feet sand road on the eastern side of petitioner's house in Peria Korrukkai which is classified as Government Poromboke land bearing Survey Numbers 404/16 situated in Peria Korukkai & Post, Thiruthuraipoondi Taluk, Tiruvarur District so as to have a free ingress and egress and easy access by four wheeler vehicles, heavy vehicles and vehicles used for agricultural purpose. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nagarajan For Respondents : Mr.M.S.Arasakumar Government Advocate for R1, R2 & R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.