- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 February 2026
- Bench
- S Justice T.V.Thamilselvi
- Case no.
- SA 831/2021
Judgment
JUDGMENT When the matter is taken up for hearing, today, the learned counsels on either sides appeared along with their respective parties and submitted that both the parties have agreed to settle the matter for a sum of Rs.5,50,000/- towards full and final settlement. Accordingly, the appellant issued the said amount by way of Demand Draft No.060163 dated 09.01.2026 drawn on State Bank of India, Panruti Branch, to the respondent and the respondent is also received the said Demand Draft for Rs.5,50,000/- before this Court. The True copy of the DD is also enclosed along with Memo of compliance.
¶2The learned counsel for the appellant/defendant would submit that the appellant/defendant may be permitted to get the return of the original Documents ie. Sale deed-Ex.B1 from the Trial Court. Page3 of 6
3.The learned counsel for the respondent/plaintiff would submit that the respondent/plaintiff may be permitted to withdraw the amount which was deposited before the Trial Court along with accrued interest.
4.In view of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsels on either side and having considered the memo of compliance filed by the parties concerned, the respondent/plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the amount which was deposited in the Trial Court or the Appellate Court if any, along with accrued interest within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order after filing proper application before the Trial Court. Further, the appellant/defendant is also permitted to get back the original documents, ie. Title Deed-Ex.B1 filed before the Trial Court after filing of proper application before the Trial Court within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
¶5Further, the Trial Court is directed to return the amount deposited by the respondent/plaintiff and Original document ie.Title deed-Ex.B1 belongs to the appellant/defendant, to the respective parties on verification. Page4 of 6
¶6Accordingly the Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived between the parties. The Memorandum of Compliance dated 26.09.2023 shall form part of the decree. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 03-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Lbm Page5 of 6 To A.Arumugam M/a.62 Years, S/o.Arunachalam, Thiruvamoor Village And Post, Periya Colony, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District. SAoNo.o831oofo2021 T.V.THAMILSELVIoJ. Lbm SAoNo.o831oofo2021 AND CMPoNO.o16012oOFo2021 03-02-2026 Page6oofo6
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND CMP NO. 16012 OF 2021 K.Kalaiselvi W/o.Kannappillai, No.50 Sundara Mastery Nagar, Kauri Thirumana Mandapam Opposite, Diversion Road, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Appellant(s) Vs A.Arumugam M/a.62 Years, S/o.Arunachalam, Thiruvamoor Village And Post, Periya Colony, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Respondent(s) To set aside the Judgment and decree dated 26.03.2021 made in AS.No.11 of 2016 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Panruti in confirming the Judgement and decree dated 01.08.2016 made in O.S.No.721 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Panruti. Page2 of 6 For Appellant(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran For Respondent(s): Mr.V.K.Thiruvengadam for Mr.A.Sundaravadhananan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.