- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 April 2026
- Bench
- M. Nirmal Kumar
- Case no.
- CRL OP 9621/2026
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner claiming to be a victim, who allegedly cheated by the accused in Cr.No.16 of 2022, corresponding to CC.No.7 of 2022 on the file of the Special Judge No.I TNPID Court, Chennai, has filed this petition seeking to include him as a witness. Page1 of 5
¶2The contention of the petitioner is that he was cheated by the accused to the tune of Rs.2.205 crores. Though he had lodged a complaint with the respondent Police and produced documents available with him to establish that he his a victim, the respondent Police did not consider the same. After completion of investigation in Crime No.16 of 2022, a charge sheet was filed. On perusal of the same, it is found that the petitioner's name was not included in the list of witnesses. Hence, the present petition has been filed.
¶3The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that further investigation is going on in C.C.No.7 of 2022 and in the course of such further investigation, the petitioner's complaint was already considered. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been contacted and steps are being taken to include him as a witness.
¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner's plea that he should be added as a witness has been pending from 2023. Though the petitioner was contacted over phone, neither he was formally summoned nor the documents available with him were collected. Further, the petitioner earlier approached this Court in Crl.OP.No.7220 of 2023 seeking to conduct further investigation in Crime No.16 of 2022, wherein this Court recorded the statement of the petitioner that the petitioner is a victim, who had invested Page2 of 5 around 2.205 crores and he has not been shown as a witness and no document has been collected from him. Despite the order passed by this Court on
03.04.2023, so far, the petitioner has not been summoned.
¶5In reply, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) fairly submitted that the petitioner will be treated as a witness and that summons will be issued to him shortly. It is further stated that his statement will be recorded, the documents will be collected from the petitioner and he will be included as a witness in C.C.No.7 of 2022 and same will be placed before the concerned Court.
¶6Recording the above submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction that the respondent Police shall complete the aforesaid exercise, namely, issuing summons to the petitioner, recording his statement, collecting relevant documents, and including him as a witness in C.C.No.7 of 2022 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 17-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order PVS Page3 of 5 To
¶1The Special Judge No.I, TNPID Court, Chennai
¶2The Deputy Superintendent of Police Economic Offences Wing (EOW II) Police Training College Ashok Nagar, Chennai - 600 083 Cr.No.16 of 2022
¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page4 of 5 CRLoOPoNo.o9621oofo2026 M.NIRMALoKUMAR,oJ. PVS CRLoOPoNo.o9621oofo2026 17-04-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR Bharath ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By Its The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing (EOW II), Police Training College, Ashok Nagar, Chennai - 600 083 Cr.No.16 of 2022 ..Respondent(s) To issue suitable direction or in the nature of direction, to direct respondent police to add the petitioner as Witness in Cr.No.16 of 2022 on the Respondent Police in CC.No.7 of 2022 on the file of the Special Judge No.I TNPID Court, Chennai based on the complaints of the petitioner by filing supplementary chargesheet before the Trial Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Saranraj For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Vinothraja, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.