- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 March 2026
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- WP 21179/2023
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to provide Fair Compensation for the lands of the petitioner's property admeasuring an extent of 0.83 Acres at Survey No. 152/4A, situated at Attakurikki Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District based on the petitioner's representation dated 31.01.2023 under the Right to Fair Compensation(Rehabilitation and Resettlement)Act, 2013.
¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the representation was filed, not to include the petitioner's land in the acquisition process.
¶3The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the acquisition process has already been completed and, the award amount also quantified and the same has been deposited.
¶4The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this Court may atleast permit the petitioner to file appropriate application for the purpose of enhancement of compensation. Page3 of 4
¶5In the present case, admittedly, the petitioner has given representation only for not to include the petitioner's land in the acquisition process. However, the acquisition was completed and the award amount has also been deposited and subsequently, the property was taken over by the respondents.
¶6In such being the case, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an appropriate application / representation seeking enhancement of compensation, in the event he is aggrieved by the award amount. If any such application / representation is made, the 1st respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on the same within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶7This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above terms. No costs. 24-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order KKN Page4 of 4
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. KKN To
¶1The District Collector, Krishnagiri District.
¶2The Special District Revenue Officer(L.A), Hosur SIPCOT Industrial Complex, SIPCOT Phase II, IV & Kurubarapalli, Krishnagiri District.
¶3The Special Tahsildar(L.A), SIPCOT Phase IV, Unit III, Shoolagiri, Krishnagiri District. 24-03-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY V.Sathish Kumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Krishnagiri District. 2. The Special District Revenue Officer(L.A), Hosur SIPCOT Industrial Complex, SIPCOT Phase II, IV & Kurubarapalli, Krishnagiri District. 3. The Special Tahsildar(L.A), SIPCOT Phase IV, Unit III, Shoolagiri, Krishnagiri District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to provide Fair Compensation for the lands of the petitioner's property admeasuring an extent of 0.83 Acres at Survey No. 152/4A, situated at Attakurikki Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District based on the petitioner's representation dated 31.01.2023 under the Right to Fair Compensation(Rehabilitation and Resettlement)Act, 2013. For Petitioner(s): Ms.R.Saritha For Respondent(s): Mr.Vadivelu Deendayalan Additional Government Pleader Page2 of 4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.