VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Madeswaran Thangavel v. The Deputy Commissioner (Ct)

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 April 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 14208/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan

Judgment

ORDER Mrs.P.Selvi, Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

¶3The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated

25.07.2024, whereby the proposal in the Show Cause notice in DRC-01 dated

27.05.2024 has been confirmed.

¶4It is submitted that the petitioner's auditor had reversed the Input Tax Credit availed on the vehicles which according to the petitioner are pick up vehicle which are outside the purview of exclusion contained in Section 17(5) of the Act.

¶5It is further submitted that these vehicles were used for transporting goods in connection with the business carried on by the petitioner. Page3 of 6

¶6That apart the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had earlier attempted to challenge the impugned order by filing an appeal on 03.02.2026 and had pre-deposited 10% of the disputed tax over and above the same, the petitioner has also pre-deposited the entire disputed tax in excess of the demand confirmed.

¶7Primafacie the petitioner has made out a case against the demand confirmed in the impugned order.

¶8Considering the same the case is remitted back to the second Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits and in accordance with law subject to the petitioner filing a detailed reply within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶9Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 16.05.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

25.07.2024 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 16.05.2024.

¶10It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted, if the Petitioner had deposited the entire disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not Page4 of 6 being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶11In case the petitioner has deposited the entire disputed tax, the second respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, within a period of three(3) months of such reply.

¶12In case the Petitioner has not deposited the entire tax amount, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶13Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶14This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 10-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SMN Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Coimbatore, Tamil nadu

¶2The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Velandipalayam Circle, Coimbatore-II, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu WPoNo.o14208oofo2026 C.SARAVANAN,oJ. smn WPoNo.o14208oofo2026oand W.M.P.Nos.15447oando15450oofo2026 10-04-2026 (1/2) Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN WP No. 14208 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.15447 and 15450 of 2026 Madeswaran Thangavel Proprietor,Tvl. Anjali Timbers Steels, DO No 7/2 A, Anna Nagar, M T P Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. 641 030 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Coimbatore, Tamil nadu 2. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Velandipalayam Circle, Coimbatore-II, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to call for the records on the files of the 2nd Respondent herein in GSTIN 33AGFPT6168F1Z7/2019-20 dated 25.07.2024, order under section 73 of the TNGST/CGST Act, 2017 and the summary of the order in Form GST DRC-07 both dated 25.07.2024 issued in Reference No. ZD330724304135S and Consequential order passed by the 1st Respondent in GSTIN/Temp ID/UIN 33AGFPT6168F1Z7 against ARN AD330326008219C dated 09.03.2026 and quash the same and pass any such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and render justice. For Petitioner(s): Jayaprathap A N R Pavithra Baskaran Page2 of 6 For Respondent(s): Mrs.P.Selvi, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.