VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Santhosh Kumar v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 April 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 14118/2026

Judgment

ORDER Mr.C. Harsharaj, Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the First Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Special Government pleader for the First Respondent.

¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 13.09.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 17.06.2025 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. It is noticed that the impugned order is an exparte-order in the absence of the reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 17.06.2025. Page3 of 7

¶4It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired long before. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on

08.04.2026.

¶5At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 25% of the disputed tax confirmed in the respective impugned order as a condition for denovo adjudication.

¶6The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle, which is extracted hereunder:- " On instructions from my client I am giving consent to pay 25% of tax "

¶7Recording the above consent, the case is remitted back to the First Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page4 of 7

¶8Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 17.06.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

13.09.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 17.06.2025

¶9In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the First Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶10It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶11In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the First Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today. Page5 of 7

¶12Needless to state, before passing any such order, the First Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶13This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 10-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SMN Page6 of 7 To

¶1The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Mettur Assessmetn Circle, Kalaivanisankar Mandapam, Panan Nagar, mettur, Salem II, Salem Tamil nadu 636 403

¶2The Branch Manager Karur Vysya Bank, Dharmapuri Main Road, Near Bus Stand, Ward No.1, Omalur, Salem, Tamil Nadu. WPoNo.o14118oofo2026 C.SARAVANAN,oJ. smn WPoNo.o14118oofo2026oand W.M.P.No.15352oando15353oofo2026 10-04-2026 (1/2) Page7oofo7

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN WP No. 14118 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.15352 and 15353 of 2026 Santhosh Kumar Proprietor, Tvl. Shri Amman Agro Service, 6/238, Indira Nagar, Tharamangalam Main Road, Panchanampatty Post, Omalur TK,Salem, Tamil Nadu.636 455 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Mettur Assessmetn Circle, Kalaivanisankar Mandapam, Panan Nagar, mettur, Salem II, Salem Tamil nadu 636 403 2. The Branch Manager Karur Vysya Bank, Dharmapuri Main Road, Near Bus Stand, Ward No.1, Omalur, Salem, Tamil Nadu. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India to to issue a writ of certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the files of the 1st Respondent herein in GSTIN 33EGSPS8996F1ZB/2021-22 dated 13.09.2025, Order under section 73 and the summary of the order in Form GST DRC-07 both dated 13.09.2025 issued in Reference No. ZD330925156646Z and consequential order passed by the 1st Respondent in GSTIN.No. 33EGSPS8996F1ZB /2025/A2 dated 02.12.2025 wrongly mentioned the GSTIN.No. as 33BDSPM597701ZC /2025/A2 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to lift the attachment of the petitioners Bank Account associated with PAN Number EGSPS8996F Page2 of 7 held by the petitioner in the 2nd respondent bank and pass any such further or other orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and render justice. For Petitioner(s): Jayaprathap A N R M. Manickasundaram Pavithra Baskaran For First Respondent(s): Mr.C. Harsharaj, Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.