VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Tamilazhagan v. The Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 16036/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is Page No.1 of 4 owned by him, based on his online application, dated 05.11.2025, with the assistance of the 2nd respondent.

¶2The petitioner had submitted an application through on-line on

05.11.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent and Mr.V.Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), accepts notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the 1st respondent is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom they deem fit to put on notice, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:- Page No.2 of 4

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the 1st respondent is directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the 1st respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the 1st respondent, the 2nd respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order.

(d) There shall be no order as to costs.

24.04.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order sp To

1.The Tahsildar, Taluk office, Pochampalli, Krishnagiri District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Barur Police Station, Krishnagiri District. Page No.3 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,

J.

sp

24.04.2026 Page No.4 of 4

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.04.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Tamilazhagan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Taluk office, Pochampalli, Krishnagiri District. 2.Inspector of Police, Barur Police Station, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 12.03.2026 with regard to survey in the petitioner's properties comprised in Survey No.439/3, 343/3A1 is situated at Damodarahalli Village, Kudimenahalli, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri District. For Petitioner : Mr.P.M.Jayachandran For Respondents : Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Government Advocate [R1] Mr.V.Meganathan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) [R2] *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.