- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 June 2026
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- WP 15231/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representations dated 20.06.2024 and 15.09.2024.
¶2Mr.Senthamizh Selvan, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4.
¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.
¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed the representations dated 20.06.2024 and 15.09.2024 before Page2 of 5 the respondents, requesting them to reduce the extent of 0.03 cents from patta No.614 issued in the name of 5th respondent for the property comprised in grama Natham S.No.714/16 for an extent of 0.07 cents situated at Arasakuppam Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District and issue separate patta for
0.03 cents in the petitioner's name. However, the said representations were not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition.
¶5In reply, the learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of within a period of 4 weeks and hence, she requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.
¶6Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.
¶7In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 20.06.2024 and 15.09.2024 and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶8With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. Page3 of 5
¶9Post this matter for reporting compliance on 07.07.2026. 02-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nsa To
¶1The District Collector Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.
¶2The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.
¶3The Revenue Divisional Officer Hosur, Krishnagiri District.
¶4The Tahsildar Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Page4 of 5 WPoNo.o15231oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o15231oofo2026 02-06-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY M.Govindan S/o.Late.Munisamy, No.2/27, Kalugopachandiram Vilalge, Arasakuppam Post, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District-635 107 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 2. The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Hosur, Krishnagiri District. 4. The Tahsildar Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 5. Munisamy s/o.Soodappa, Kalugopachandiram Village, Arasakuppam Post, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District-635 107 ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 5 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to reduce the extent of 0.03 cents from patta No.614 issued in the name of 5th respondent for the property comprised in grama Natham S.No.714/16 for an extent of 0.07 cents situated at Arasakuppam Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District and issue separate patta for 0.03 cents in the petitioner name by considering the petitioners representations dated 20.06.2024 and 15.09.2024 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Jayaprakash For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Senthamizh Selvan, for R1 to 4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.