- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 23 March 2026
- Bench
- G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
- Case no.
- CRL OP 11239/2023
Judgment
O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in P.R.C.No.9 of 2023 pending on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Namakkal, thereby taken cognizance for the offences punishable under Sections 312, 506(i) & 376(2)(n) of IPC.
¶2The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that now the case has been taken on file in S.C.No.63 of 2023 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Namakkal, and it is pending for trial.
¶3Pending this petition, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.
¶4A Memorandum of Compromise has been filed before this Court, which has been signed by the petitioner and the defacto complainant and also by their respective counsel. All the parties are present and identified by their respective counsel and the Police. In order to identify the respective parties, they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card and it is made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.
¶5Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the proceeding pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgment reported in 2017 9 SCC 641 in the case of Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath, this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., quashes the proceeding in S.C.No.63 of 2023 pending trial on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Namakkal.
¶6In view of the above, the proceedings in S.C.No.63 of 2023 on the file of the learned Session Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Namakkal, is hereby quashed. The terms of Memorandum of Compromise shall form part and parcel of this Order. Both the petitioner and the second respondent shall pay a sum of Rs.25,000/-, (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each as costs, to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, forthwith and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry.
¶7Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
23.03.2026 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order rts To
¶1The Principal District Judge, Namakkal.
¶2The Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Namakkal.
¶3The Inspector Of Police, All Women Police Station (AWPS) - Namakkal, Namakkal District.
¶4The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. rts Crl.O.P.No.11239 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.7077 of 2023
23.03.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.11239 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.7077 of 2023 Ibrahim Basha Razaak S/o. Razaak, No.4/469, La Ganga Nagar North, Andavar Nagar, Namakkal 637 001. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State Rep By Inspector Of Police, All Women Police Station (AWPS) - Namakkal, Namakkal District. Cr.No.11/2022. 2. Rasiya Begum D/o. Bazeer Ahamed, Meikalnaikanpatty, Thottiyam Taluk, Namakkal District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records culminating in the PRC.No.9 of 2023 pending on the file of the Court of the learned Principal District Judge, Namakkal, quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Karthikeyan For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R1 Mr.S.Mathivanan For R2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.