VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ms Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited Rep by Its Mr S Sivasubramanian v. Dilip Kumar Sahu and Another

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
1 July 2026
Bench
K.Kumaresh Babuauthor
Case no.
Arb Appln 821/2026

Judgment

O R D E R This application has been filed to appoint Mr.Sachin Thakur, Area Receivable Manager of the Applicant as a Receiver to seize the vehicle more Page2 of 5 particularly described in the schedule to the Judges Summons wherever stationed in the premises of the respondents or wherever it is found and with whomsoever it is found with powers to break open the premises and grant permission to the Receiver to obtain police aid from the concerned Police Officer.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the applicant had provided a loan to the respondents for the purchase of the vehicle Tata Motors Ltd., Model Name - Signa 3525.K 8X4 ESBVI,HD23BX, bearing Engine

No.B6.7B6A250D06222A64186136,

Chassis No.MAT777013N3A00951 and Registration No.CG12BF9016 and a Loan Agreement had also been entered by the respondents with the applicant on

22.02.2025. He would contend that there are some unremained installments that are to be made by the respondents and that in spite of repeated demands, the respondents had failed to regularize the default and had continued to not pay the EMIs. He would further submit that considering the facts of the case, the applicant had sought for an appointment of a Party Receiver which would be more effective.

¶3The Court notice that was attempted to be served on the respondents is awaited. In spite of the Affidavit of Service filed by the applicant enclosing the acknowledgment card, indicating that the said private notice had been served Page3 of 5 upon the respondents, the respondents had neither chosen to appear before this Court in person nor are being represented by a counsel. The name of the respondents have been reflected in the cause-list. They were called absent and set ex parte.

¶4I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and also perused the materials placed on record.

¶5This Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a prima facie case for appointment of a Party Receiver.

¶6Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, this Court is satisfied with the prayer sought for in this application and in fine, Mr.Sachin Thakur, Area Receivable Manager of the Applicant, as Party Receiver to seize and take possession of the asset Tata Motors Ltd., Model Name - Signa 3525.K 8X4 ESBVI,HD23BX, bearing Engine No.B6.7B6A250D06222A64186136, Chassis No.MAT777013N3A00951 and Registration No.CG12BF9016 from the respondents or any place belonging to the respondents or wherever found and with whomsoever it is found. It is also made clear that if Police help is required, the Party Receiver shall make a request to the local Police Station within whose jurisdiction the vehicle is found and on such request being made, Page4 of 5 the Station House Officer shall send the Police Personnel along with the Party Receiver to seize the vehicle. If break open of a lock is required, the Party Receiver shall do so in the presence of the Police Personnel who will counter sign the record evidencing the break open of the lock and to re-lock the premises. If the Party Receiver finds any difficulty with the jurisdictional Police, he is at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Superintendent of Police, who shall provide all necessary assistance to him at the time of seizure of the vehicle.

¶7If the respondents make good the unpaid installments or make substantial payments of the dues to be paid to the satisfaction of the applicant, the applicant shall return the asset in the condition it was re-possessed.

¶8With the above terms, this application stands disposed of. 01-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Maya Page5 of 5

K.KUMARESH BABU, J. Maya Dated : 01-07-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited, Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr.S.Sivasubramanian, No.2, N.S.C. Bose Road, Parrys, Chennai – 600 001. ..Applicant(s) Vs 1. Dilip Kumar Sahu 2. Dinesh Kumar Sahu ..Respondent(s) Prayer: To appoint Mr.Sachin Thakur, Area Receivable Manager of the Applicant as a Receiver to seize the vehicle more particularly described in the schedule to the Judges Summons wherever stationed in the premises of the respondents or wherever it is found and with whomsoever it is found with powers to break open the premises and grant permission to the Receiver to obtain police aid from the concerned Police Officer. For Petitioner(s): Ms. A.S.Neela Narayani For Respondent(s): No appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.