Pranav Global School v. The Commissioner of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P. Nos. 9693, 9704 & 9715 of 2026 & Crl.M.P. Nos. 6893, 6906 & 6912 of 2026 Crl.O.P. No. 9693 of 2026

¶1Pranav Global School, Established under Sai Pranav Educational trust, (rep. by its author cum first Trustees 2nd and 3rd petitioners) Rep. by Muthuvignesh (as per affidavit), At No.24, Silapathikaram Street, NH3, Maraimalainagar, Pincode – 603 209.

¶2Muthuvignesh

¶3Jyothilakshmi ..Petitioners

¶11\6

2.

¶3:: :: Crl.O.P. No. 9704 of 2026 Muthuvignesh ..Petitioner

¶12\6

2.

¶3:: :: Crl.O.P. No. 9715 of 2026

¶1Sai Pranav Health Care Private Limited, (rep. by 2nd and 3rd petitioners Directors), HIG 573 NH 1, Anna Salai, Maraimalainagar, Chengalpattu, Kanchipuram 603 209.

¶2Muthivignesh

¶3Jyothilakshmi ..Petitioners 3\6

1.

2.

¶3:: :: COMMON ORDER The petitioners are challenging the summons dated 30.03.2026 4\6 issued in connection with C. No. 127/DC-CCB TCP/COP(PG)2026 dated

30.03.2026 calling upon the petitioners to appear on 02.04.2026 for the purpose of enquiry.

¶2The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and that they are not involved in any of the offences alleged and only for harassing them, the said summons have been issued. Moreover, the Police have been calling the petitioners over phone and persuading them to settle the dispute with the complainant by paying the amount.

¶3Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the second summons have been issued on 13.04.2026 calling upon the petitioners to appear on 16.04.2026. However, they have not responded to the summons, instead, chose to file these quash petitions.

¶4Since a complaint has been lodged as against the petitioners, for the purpose of enquiry,, they have been called. Hence, the petitioners are directed to appear before the 2nd respondent Police, give their explanation along with supporting documents, if any. Instead of doing so, 5\6 M. NIRMAL KUMAR,J. nv challenging the summons is not proper.

¶5In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to entertain the criminal original petitions and they are dismissed. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

17.04.2026 nv To

1.

2.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.O.P. Nos. 9693,9704 & 9715 of 2026 6\6