VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Chinnaiyan v. The Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 April 2026
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP 14996/2026

Judgment

ORDER The writ petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.2649/2024/PACCS dated 07.10.2024 and to direct the respondents to disburse the Provident Fund along with interest.

¶2The petitioner was employed in the 3rd respondent Society as Secretary on 18.12.1978 and had retired from service on 31.03.2015 on attaining the age of superannuation. On the date of his retirement, the 3rd respondent had passed a Resolution, sanctioning the payment of retirement benefits viz., Earned Leave Salary (Leave Salary) of Rs.1,76,183/-, Provident Fund and Subscription Amount with interest of Rs.3,74,932/- and Gratuity Amount of Rs,5,19,771/-, to the petitioner. Despite the admitted liability and several representations, the respondent-Society had not been paid the petitioner the retirement benefits. Page3 of 6 Therefore, the petitioner had submitted his representation to the respondents 2 to 4 on 16.09.2022, requesting to disburse his Provident Fund along with interest. The 2nd respondent vide proceedings dated 26.07.2024 had rejected the request of the petitioner alleging that the Society is in a poor financial condition.

¶3Thereafter, the petitioner had approached the respondents both with oral and written representations. On 13.09.2024, the petitioner had submitted a representation which was rejected by the 2nd respondent vide impugned order dated 07.10.2024 stating that the 3rd respondent Society had not deposited the Employees Provident Fund amount either in the EPF Office or in the LIC, and further, they are not in a position to make the payment immediately to the petitioner, on account of the accumulated loss to the respondents, to the tune of Rs.1.68 crores, and that the same would be disbursed only when its financial position improves. The petitioner had waited till July 2025. Since the payment was not disbursed to him, he submitted yet another representation on

20.07.2025 and the same is pending. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court seeking to quash the impugned order of the second respondent dated 07.10.2024 and also to direct the respondents to disburse the Provident Fund.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and also perused the materials placed on record.

Page4 of 6

¶5It is rather a strange reason that has been given by the 2nd respondent for rejecting the petitioner's request for disbursing the EPF amount to him. That the petitioner had contributed his share of Provident Fund has not been disputed, the employer is bound to pay his share of Provident Fund amount and also has to ensure that the same is invested judiciously. The failure on the part of the employer to deposit the sum either in the Employees Provident Fund Account or in LIC policies / deposits, cannot be a ground to deny the petitioner his rightful due. Financial incapacity cannot be an excuse for not disbursing the EPF amount. The employer is bound to deposit his share as well as the amount deducted from the employees account towards Provident Fund into the Employees Provident Fund Account. The fact that the 2nd respondent pleads financial incapacity clearly shows that they have not contributed their share of the Employees Provident Fund amount, which could also invite a penal action under the Employees' Provident Fund Act. Therefore, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is quashed and the respondents are directed to disburse the Provident Fund amount to the petitioner, which he is entitled to, on or before 28.06.2026. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Page5 of 6

Post the writ petition for reporting compliance on 29.06.2026. 17-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order DS To:

¶1The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies Office Salem Zone, Salem District.

¶2The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Societies Office Salem Zone, Salem District.

¶3The President S.1234 Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Seshanchavadi, Senthrayanpalayam Post Valapadi Taluk, Salem District.

¶4The Secretary S.1234 Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd., Seshanchavadi, Senthrayanpalayam Post Valapadi Taluk, Salem District. WPoNo.o14996oofo2026 P.T.ASHAoJ. DS WPoNo.o14996oofo2026 and WMPoNo.o16211oOFo2026 17-04-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA AND WMP NO. 16211 OF 2026 Chinnaiyan S/o.Kandasamy, Former Secretary, S.1234 Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd., Seshanchavadi, Senthrayanpalayam Post, Valapadi Taluk, Salem District. Now residing at: No.133, Ayya Goundar Street, Valapadi Taluk Salem District. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies Office, Salem Zone, Salem District. 2. The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Societies Office, Salem Zone, Salem District. 3. The President S.1234 Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Seshanchavadi, Senthrayanpalayam Post, Valapadi Taluk, Salem District. 4. The Secretary S.1234 Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd., Seshanchavadi, Senthrayanpalayam Post, Valapadi Taluk, Salem District. ..Respondents Page2 of 6 PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.2649/ 2024/PACCS dated 07.10.2024, to quash the same, and consequently to direct the respondents to disburse the Provident Fund amount along with principal and accrued interest within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner: Ms.Neelavathi P For Respondents: Mr.K.Tamilvendan Government Advocate for R1 to R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.