VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

V.Jamuna, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 14579/2026

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to conclude the enquiry and pass final orders on the petitioner's representation seeking for deletion of the wrongful entry in the computerised Chitta/Patta and other revenue records pertaining to the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition, which has included the 3rd respondent's name.

2.Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. Since no adverse orders are passed against the 3rd respondent in this writ petition, notice to the 3rd respondent is dispensed with.

3.As seen from the documents filed along with this Writ Petition, based on the petitioner's representation, proceedings has already been initiated by the 1st respondent, but no final order has been passed till date. Page2 of 4

4.No prejudice would be caused to any of the parties if a direction is issued to the 1st respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, by giving due consideration to the documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the 3rd respondent, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

5.For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the 1st respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 25.09.2025, followed by the reminder dated

09.03.2026, seeking for deletion of the wrongful entry in the computerised Chitta/Patta and other revenue records pertaining to the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition by removing the name of the 3 rd respondent, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the 3rd respondent and any other third party whom the 1st respondent deem fit to enquire, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 17-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Page3 of 4 Speaking/Non-speaking order GSA

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA To

¶1The Revenue Divisional Officer, Arakkonam,Ranipettai District.

¶2The Tasildar, Nemili Taluk,Ranipet District. 17-04-2026 Page4 of 4

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE V.Jamuna ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Arakkonam, Ranipettai District. 2. The Tasildar, Nemili Taluk, Ranipet District. 3. Kishore Kumar ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein the consider the representation, dated 25.09.2025 and the reminder dated 09.03.2026 of the petitioner, hold and conclude the enquiry with regard to the wrongful entry of the name of the 3rd respondent in the computerized Chitta / Patta and other Revenue Records, pertaining to the land in S.No.247/3 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a time frame to be stipulated by this court. For Petitioner(s): Ms.G.Sumitra For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander, Page1 of 4 Special Government Pleader (For R1 & R2)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.