VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Jayalakshmi v. The Managing Director

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 14711/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner has challenged the impugned notice, dated

02.01.2026 in Form-B as per the provisions of Section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997.

¶2Mr.B.Vijay, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent. Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 and 3.

¶3On instructions, the learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent submits that the first respondent has decided to withdraw the impugned notice, dated 02.01.2026 issued in Form-B as per the provisions of Section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, but, however, proposes to issue a fresh notice for the two survey numbers in S.No.210/34A and S.No.210/35A.

¶4Since the first respondent has decided to withdraw the impugned notice, dated 02.01.2026, the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has now become infructuous.

¶5After recording the undertaking given by the first respondent that the impugned notice, dated 02.01.2026 in Form-B issued as per the provisions of Section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 shall be withdrawn, this Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to the respondents to issue a fresh notice in Form-B under Section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 in respect of S.No.210/34A and S.No.210/35A. However, liberty is also granted to the petitioner to challenge the same as and when the same is issued by the respondents in the manner known to the petitioner under law. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

16.04.2026 Index : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order : yes/no grs To

¶1The Managing Director, Chennai Metro Rail Ltd., Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 025.

¶2The Special District Revenue Officer (LAO), Chennai Metro Rail Ltd., Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 025.

¶3The Special Tahsildar (LA), Chennai Metro Rail Ltd., Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 025.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. grs and W.M.P.Nos.15973 and 15975 of 2026

16.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16.04.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.Nos.15973 and 15975 of 2026 R.Jayalakshmi .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Managing Director, Chennai Metro Rail Ltd., Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 025. 2. The Special District Revenue Officer (LAO), Chennai Metro Rail Ltd., Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 025. 3. The Special Tahsildar (LA), Chennai Metro Rail Ltd., Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 025. .. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the notice, dated 02.01.2026 in Form B under Section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 insofar as the lands of an extent of 1168 Square Meters in Survey No.210/34A and 61 Square Meters in Survey No.210/35A of Kattupakkam Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Thriuvallur District and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mrs.A.L.Gandhimathi, Senior Counsel, for Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.B.Vijay, Standing Counsel for R1 : Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan, Additional Government Pleader, for RR-2 and 3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.