VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Janarthanan v. State Rep by Its, Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 June 2025
Bench
P. Velmuruganauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 16347/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P. Velmurugan

Judgment

ORDER Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶2The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram, in Crl.M.P.No.1432 of 2024, which dismissed his request for relaxation of conditions imposed in Crl.R.P.No.201 of 2021.

¶3The case was initially registered against the petitioner under Sections 379, 430 of IPC and Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, vide Crime No.311/2020, dated 01.05.2020. The petitioner was arrayed as the 4th Accused, and the respondent police seized the Mahindra Bolero Pickup Van (Reg. No: PY-05-F-0180) on allegations of illegal transportation of river sand. The investigating officer later confirmed that the sand was sourced from the Vazhuthavur Sangarabarani River in Villupuram. The vehicle remained in police custody, leading the petitioner to file a petition under Section 451 Cr.P.C before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Villupuram, seeking interim custody of the vehicle. The petition was dismissed on 05.04.2021. Aggrieved by the order, the petitioner moved a Criminal Revision Petition in Crl.R.P.No.201/2021 before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram, which was allowed on 04.09.2021, subject to certain conditions. Despite the conditional relief granted, the petitioner failed to

comply with those conditions for nearly three years. In 2024, he filed Crl.M.P.No.1432/2024 seeking an extension of time to fulfill the requirements, citing financial difficulties and his sole dependence on the vehicle for livelihood. The petition was dismissed on 29.02.2024, and challenging the said order, the present criminal original petition.

¶4A perusal of records, it could be seen that the vehicle Mahindra Bolero Pickup Van (Reg.No:PY-05-F-0180) was seized by the respondent police on

01.05.2020 in connection with Crime No.311/2020, registered under Sections 379, 430 IPC and Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957. The petitioner sought its return under Section 451 Cr.P.C, but the request was dismissed by the Judicial Magistrate-II, Villupuram, on 05.04.2021. Later, the petitioner filed Crl.R.P.No.201 of 2021 before the Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram, who allowed it on 04.09.2021, imposing certain conditions for release, including surrendering the RC book, executing a bond of Rs.5,00,000/-, providing an undertaking not to use the vehicle illegally, and other directions. . Despite obtaining this relief, the petitioner did not comply with those conditions for nearly three years and subsequently sought an extension of time through Crl.M.P.No.1432/2024, citing financial difficulties. While the petitioner contends that his livelihood depends on the vehicle, legal principles require that court orders must be complied with within the stipulated time. The prolonged delay in fulfilling the conditions reflects a lack of diligence on the petitioner's part, as he neither complied nor sought any

modification, only filing a petition in the year 2024. In the considered opinion of this Court, the learned Sessions Judge rightly dismissed the relaxation petition, and this Court finds no reason to interfere with the said order. However, considering the fact that no confiscation steps were initiated by the respondent police, this Court directs them to immediately commence confiscation proceedings, ensuring due notice is served on the petitioner.

¶5With the above observations, this criminal original petition is dismissed.

10.06.2025 r n s Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No

To

¶1The Inspector of Police, Kandamangalam Police Station, Villupuram District.

2.The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

P.VELMURUGAN, J r n s

10.06.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 10.06.2025 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN -- Janarthanan .. Petitioner Vs. State rep. by its Inspector of Police, Kandamangalam Police Station, Villupuram District. .. Respondent (Cr.No.311 of 2020) Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to set aside the order passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram dated 29.02.2024 vide Crl.M.P.No.1432 of 2024 in Crl.R.P.No.201 of 2021. For petitioner : Mr.A.T.Anbu Kumar For respondent: MDr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.