VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Srinivasan v. The Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 18861/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's online application dated 27.04.2024.

¶2Mr.M.Guruprasad, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed an online application dated 27.04.2024 before the 1st respondents, requesting them to survey the subject land. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the 1st respondent till date. Hence, this petition.

¶5In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of within a period of 8 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. Page3 of 5

¶6Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶7In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 1st respondent to consider the online application filed by the petitioner dated 27.04.2024 and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondent for conducting survey at the subject land. If there is any dispute with regard to the possession over the said property, the same has to be decided only by way of filing a suit before an appropriate Civil Court.

¶9If any police protection is required at the time of conducting survey, the 1st respondent is granted liberty to avail the same by approaching the 2nd respondent. In such case, the 2nd respondent shall provide all necessary protection to the 1st respondent till the completion of survey at the subject land. Page4 of 5

¶10With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 08-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nsa To

¶1The Tahsildar Mettur Taluk, Salem District

¶2The Inspector of Police Nangavali Police station, Mettur Taluk, Salem District WPoNo.o18861oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o18861oofo2026 08-06-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Srinivasan S/o Late ShriPalaniappan kaliyur Kattu Valavu, Viruthasampatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar Mettur Taluk, Salem District 2. The Inspector of Police Nangavali Police station, Mettur Taluk, Salem District 3. Dharmaraj S/o Shri. Andiappan Kaliyur katta Valavu, V8iruthasampatti Village, mettur Taluk, Salem District ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, direct the 1st Respondent to survey the land in Survey no 155/2A Viruthasampatti Village Mettur Taluk, Salem District based on the online application dated 27.04.2024 within the time fixed by this Honble Court For Petitioner(s): Ms.R.Divya, for Mr.B.Manoharan For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Guruprasad, Govt's counsel for R1 & 2 Page2 of 5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.