VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

K.Senthamarai v. The Additional Inspector General of Registration

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 March 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 13992/2020

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has filed against the order passed by the 1st respondent vide Letter dated 11.02.2020.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner had filed an application before the respondents, requesting for cancellation of a fraudulent document by invoking the power available to them under Section 68(2) of the Registration Act, 1908. However, the said application was rejected by the respondent, vide impugned order dated 11.02.2020. Hence, this petition.

¶3In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that now, the validity of Section 68(2) of the Registration Act, 1908, was struck down by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.08.2024 in W.P.No.10291 of 2022. In such case, the said application for cancellation of fraudulent document cannot be entertained by the respondents. Hence, he would submit that now, the only recourse available to the petitioner is to file a petition before the concerned Civil Court either for cancellation of aforesaid fraudulent document or to declare the same as "null and void". Thus, he prays for dismissal of this petition.

¶4Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶5In the case on hand, initially, an application was filed by the petitioner, requesting the respondents to cancel the fraudulent document, by invoking the power available to them under Section 68(2) of the Registration Act, 1908. The said application was rejected by the respondent vide the impugned order dated

11.02.2020.

¶6As rightly contended by the respondent, the validity of Section 68(2) of the Registration Act, 1908, was struck down by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.08.2024 in W.P.No.10291 of 2022. In such case, the respondents will not have any power to cancel the aforesaid fraudulent document. Therefore, now, the only recourse available to the petitioner is to file a petition before the concerned Civil Court either for cancellation of aforesaid fraudulent document or to declare the same as "null and void".

¶7In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a suitable petition before the appropriate Civil Court. No cost. 05-03-2026 nsa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To

1.The Additional Inspector General of Registration Office of Inspector General of Registration, Chennai - 600 028Chennai

2.The District Registrar Registration Department, Velapadi, Vellore.

3.The Sub Registrar Thirupathur District, Thirupathur.

4.The District Collector Thirupathur District, Thirupathur

5.The District Superintendent of Police O/o The Superintendent of Police, Thirupathur

6.The Thasildhar O/o The Thasildhar, Thirupathur District. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa

05-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY K.Senthamarai D/o. Kannu Goundar, Vinayakapuram Village, Aadhiyur Post, Thirupathur Division, Vellore District. Vellore Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Additional Inspector General of Registration Office of Inspector General of Registration, Chennai - 600 028Chennai 2.The District Registrar Registration Department, Velapadi, Vellore. 3.The Sub Registrar Thirupathur District, Thirupathur. 4.The District Collector Thirupathur District, Thirupathur 5.The District Superintendent of Police O/o The Superintendent of Police, Thirupathur 6.The Thasildhar O/o The Thasildhar, Thirupathur District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Certiorari, calling for records relating to the order of the 1st respondent made in Letter No.951/U1/2020 dated 11.02.2020 to quash the same and to consequently direct the respondents 4 and 6 to forthwith restore the petitioners name in the Revenue Records. For Petitioner(s): Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Harish, GA

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.