VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

K.Arunagiri v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 15568/2026

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to survey the pathway, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his representation, dated 21.11.2025, with the assistance of the 4th respondent, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner had submitted a representation, dated 21.11.2025, for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered by the official respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.V.Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), accepts notice on behalf of the 4th respondent. Page2 of 4

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to survey the pathway of the petitioner's property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom they deem fit to put on notice, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the pathway in question, the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 2 and 3 shall conduct survey of the pathway morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the respondents 2 and 3, the 4th respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order.

(d) There shall be no order as to costs. 21-04-2026 GSA Page3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA To

¶1The District collector Erode District Erode.

¶2The Tahsildar Nambiyur Taluk Erode.

¶3The Head surveyor Nambiyur Taluk Erode District.

¶4The Inspector of Police Varapalayam police station Erode District. 21-04-2026 Page4 of 4

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE K.Arunagiri ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector Erode District Erode. 2. The Tahsildar Nambiyur Taluk Erode. 3. The Head surveyor Nambiyur Taluk Erode District. 4. The Inspector of Police Varapalayam police station Erode District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to conduct a survey of the pathway in Re.Sa.No.248/3A1 situated at Vemandampalayam village, Nambiyur Taluk, Erode District and consequently directing the 4th respondent to provide police protection by considering the petitioner's representation dated 21.11.2025 with in a stipulated time fixed by this court. Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Dinesh For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Government Advocate [for R1 to R3] Mr.V.Meganathan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) (For R4)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.