VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R. Santhiya v. R. Raghul

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 July 2026
Bench
P.B. Balajiauthor
Case no.
TR CMP 444/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.B. Balaji

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner seeks transfer of FCOP.No.254 of 2023 from the file of the Family Court, Vellore, to the file of the Family Court, Villupuram.

¶2Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the respondent.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would state that there are two parallel proceedings, one initiated by the petitioner-wife for restitution of Page2 of 5 conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act and another by the respondent-husband in FCOP.No.254 of 2023 on the file of the Family Court, Vellore. The proceedings filed for restitution of conjugal rights are pending in H.M.O.P.No.171 of 2024 on the file of the Family Court, Villupuram, where the petitioner has also filed MC proceedings, which is also pending. The learned counsel for the petitioner would also bring to my notice that a child of tender age 1 ½ years is in the custody of the petitioner and hence, the petitioner finding it really inconvenient and is also seriously prejudiced in being compelled to attend the proceedings at Vellore. She would in any event contend that since the divorce petition and restitution petition are pending, the same ought to be tried jointly to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting orders.

¶4The learned counsel for the respondent would state that though the respondent is willing to settle the matter amicably, the petitioner did not come forward to attend the mediation proceedings, despite the matter being sent to the mediation centre. She would therefore state that the transfer petition is filed only to protract the proceedings and harass the respondent further.

¶5I have carefully considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel on either side. Page3 of 5

¶6Admittedly, there are two proceedings, one for restitution of conjugal rights filed by the wife and another for dissolution of marriage filed by the husband. Both these proceedings will have to necessarily be jointly tried to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, as well as conflicting orders. Hence, I see reason for the request for transfer. Moreover, the inconvenience caused to the petitioner has also been set out, since the petitioner has custody of a child aged 1 ½ years and the petitioner will not be in a position to travel all the way to Vellore to attend the proceedings initiated by the respondent for dissolution of marriage in FCOP.No.254 of 2023. In the light of the above, I am inclined to accede to the request of the petitioner seeking transfer.

¶7Accordingly, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and the proceedings in FCOP.No.254 of 2023 is hereby withdrawn from the file of the Family Court, Vellore and transferred to the file of the Family Court, Villupuram, to be jointly tried with HMOP.No.171 of 2024 filed by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The following additional directions are also issued in the manner following:

(i) Pleadings shall be completed in HMOP.No.171 of 2024, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of bundles from the Family Court, Vellore. Till such time, the proceedings in FCOP.No.254 of 2023 shall remain stayed. Page4 of 5

(ii) Upon completion of pleadings, evidence shall be recorded in FCOP.No.254 of 2023 and both the cases shall be jointly tried and disposed of expeditiously, on or before 31.05.2027.

(iii) No costs. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 07-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order ATA To

1.The Family Court, Vellore.

2.The Family Court, Villupuram. TRoCMPoNo.o444oofo2025 P.B.BALAJI,oJ. ATA TRoCMPoNo.o444oofo2025 07-07-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI & CMP.No.10329 of 2025 R. Santhiya ..Petitioner(s) Vs R. Raghul ..Respondent(s) To transfer the FCOP.No.254/2023 on the file of Honourable Family Court, Vellore to the file of the Family Court, Villupuram. For Petitioner(s): M/s.Aditya Chandramouli For Respondent(s): Mrs.K.Parveen Fathima for Ms.D.Prasenna

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.