VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

G.Kamala Ganapathi Subramanian v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 16729/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to conduct survey at the subject property.

¶2Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 25.03.2026 before the respondents, requesting for surveying the subject property and laying boundary stones therein. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition.

¶5In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of within a period of 8 weeks and hence, she requests this Court to pass appropriate orders. Page2 of 5

¶6Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶7In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the 5th & 6th respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 25.03.2026 and after issuing due notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondent for conducting survey and laying boundary stones at the subject land. If there is any dispute with regard to the possession over the said property, the same has to be decided only by way of filing a suit before an appropriate Civil Court.

¶9If any police protection is required at the time of conducting survey, the official respondents are granted liberty to avail the same by approaching the jurisdictional police station. In such case, the concerned police officer shall provide all necessary assistance to the official respondents till the completion of survey at the subject land. Page3 of 5

¶10With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 04-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nsa To

¶1The District Collector Tiruppur District, Tiruppur.

¶2The District Revenue Officer District Revenue Office, Tiruppur District.

¶3The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office, Udumalaipettai, Tiruppur District.

¶4The Assistant Commissioner Land Administration, Udumalaipettai, Tiruppur District.

¶5The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Udumalaipettai, Tiruppur District.

¶6The Town Land Surveyor Udumalaipettai Division, Tiruppur District. Page4 of 5 WPoNo.o16729oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o16729oofo2026 04-06-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY G.Kamala Ganapathi Subramanian W/o.Late Ganapathi Subramanian, 11, Justice Jambulingam road, mylapore, chennai - 600004. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Tiruppur District, Tiruppur. 2. The District Revenue Officer District Revenue Office, Tiruppur District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office, Udumalaipettai, Tiruppur District. 4. The Assistant Commissioner Land Administration, Udumalaipettai, Tiruppur District. 5. The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Udumalaipettai, Tiruppur District. 6. The Town Land Surveyor Udumalaipettai Division, Tiruppur District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to survey my land survey No.144/B to an extent of 49 cents out of 5 acre 15 cents situate at udumalai kanakkanpalayam village, udumalaipettai taluk, Tiruppur District within the time frame that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. Page1 of 5 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Venkatraman For Respondent(s): Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, Govt's counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.