VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ravi v. The Inspector General of Registration,

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 17727/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition is filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation dated 14.03.2026. Page3 of 5

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have made a representation dated 14.03.2026 before the respondents 1 to 3 to cancel the sale deeds in Doc.No.15102/2019 dated 29.10.2019, Doc.No.15772/2019 dated 08.11.2019, Doc.No.15784/2019 dated 08.11.2019, Doc.No.15918/2019 dated 12.11.2019 and Doc.No.16183/2019 dated

18.11.2019 at SRO Avadi as null and void. However, till date, the said representation was not considered. Hence, this writ petition.

¶3Mr.Dominic S.David, learned Government's Counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 and submitted that the official respondents have no power to cancel the sale deeds, as the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of M.Kathirvel Vs., Inspector General of Registration, Department of Registration and Others, reported in 2024 SCC Online Mad 6154 has struck down Sections 77A and 68(2) of the Registration Act. Hence, the right course available to the petitioners is to file a civil suit before the appropriate forum.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶5Recording the submission made by the learned Government's Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty Page4 of 5 to file a civil suit before the Civil Court in the manner known to law. No costs. 02-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM To:

¶1The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai - 600028.

¶2The District Registrar, Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District.

¶3The Sub Registrar, Avadi - 600 054.

¶4L.I.C. Housing Finance Ltd., Harrington Chambers, No. 30/1A, Block-C, Abdul Razack, 1st street, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015.

¶5Bank of Baroda, 198/2, Srinivasa Nagar Main Road, Baba Nagar 1st main road, Villivakkam, Chennai-600 049.

¶6State Bank of India Retail Assets Central Processing Centre (RACPC) Ayyappanthangal, Chennai-600 056. WPoNo.o17727oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMY,oJ. VM WPoNo.o17727oofo2026 02-06-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY 1. Ravi 2. Punithavalli ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai - 600028. 2. The District Registrar, Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District. 3. The Sub Registrar, Avadi - 600 054. 4. K.Jayaraman 5. Indhirani 6. Shanthi 7. Baby 8. D.Ragupathy 9. Anand Jain 10.L.I.C. Housing Finance Ltd., Harrington Chambers, No. 30/1A, Block - C, Abdul Razack, 1st street, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015. 11.M.Geetha 12.A.Senthamaraikannan 13.S.Sripattu Page2 of 5 14.Bank of Baroda 198/2, Srinivasa Nagar Main Road, Baba Nagar 1st main road, Villivakkam, Chennai-600 049 15.K.Srinivasan, 16.K.S.Pushpavalli 17.State Bank of India, Retail Assets Central Processing Centre (RACPC), Ayyappanthangal, Chennai-600 056 18.R.Prasad 19.T.Dhanalakshmi ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to cancel the Deeds in Doc.No.15102/2019 dated 29.10.2019, Doc.No.15772/2019 dated 08.11.2019, Doc.No.15784/2019 dated 08.11.2019, Doc.No.15918/2019 dated 12.11.2019 and Doc.No.16183/2019 dated 18.11.2019 at SRO Avadi as null and void, by considering the Petitioners' representation dated 14.03.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.S. Bhuvaneswaran For Respondent(s): Mr.Dominic S.David, Government's Counsel for R1 to 3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.