G.Mariappan v. The Principal Secretary to

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to call for the records relating to the order passed by the 1st respondent in Letter No.2768/C2/2016-4, dated

27.06.2016 and quash the same and to direct the respondents to sanction pension from the date of attaining the age of 58 years.

2.The case of the petitioner is that he joined as Pump Operator in Public Works Department on 16.09.1971 and he resigned his job on 27.12.1981. After being in service for 10 years, he made a representation to the 3rd respondent on

22.11.2015, claiming pension.

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Additional Page3 of 6 Advocate General for respondents 1 & 2 and the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent.

4.The learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner is not entitled to pension, as he resigned from service. He relied upon the Full Bench judgment of this Court made in W.P.No.39583 of 2015 dated 03.02.2026, wherein it was held as follows:

¶19In view of the discussion above, the reference is answered accordingly: A) 'Resignation' from a service or post as per Rule 23 of The Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 entails forfeiture of past service. Therefore, resignation from service even on medical or health grounds entails forfeiture of past service. B) The grounds based on which resignation is sought is immaterial and resignation shall only mean forfeiture of past service. C) There is a valid distinction between 'resignation' and 'voluntary retirement' as held by the Three Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Senior Divisional Manager LIC and Ors vs Shree Lal Meena. Therefore, resignation from service cannot be treated as voluntary retirement. Page4 of 6

5.In the aforesaid order, the Full Bench has categorically held that resignation from service or post as per Rule 23 of The Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 entails forfeiture of past service, irrespective of the grounds.

6.In the present case, the petitioner rendered service from 16.09.1971 to

27.12.1981 as pump operator and thereafter resigned. In view of the full bench order stated supra, the claim made by the writ petitioner cannot be granted.

7.Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as devoid of merits. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 16-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order sai Page5 of 6 To

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2.The Executive Engineer Water Resources Organisation (Gundar Basin Division), Public Works Department, Tallakulam, Madurai-625 002.

3.The Accountant General of Accountant General Office, Teynampet, Chennai-18. WPoNo.o38149oofo2016 N.SENTHILKUMARoJ. sai WPoNo.o38149oofo2016 and WMPoNo.o28837oofo2018 16-04-2026 Page6oofo6

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR and WMP No. 28837 of 2018 G.Mariappan S/o.Ganghadharan, Door No.90, North Car Street, Chinthamani, Puliyangudi Post - 627 855, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tirunelveli District ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2. The Executive Engineer Water Resources Organisation (Gundar Basin Division), Public Works Department, Tallakulam, Madurai-625 002. 3. The Accountant General of Accountant General Office, Teynampet, Chennai-18. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order passed by the 1st respondent in Letter No.2768/ C2/2016-4, dated 27.06.2016 Page2 of 6 and quash the same and thereby directing the respondents to sanction pension from the date of attainment of age of 58 years. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.R.Nixon, For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Muthukumar, Additional Advocate General, assisted by Mr.S.John J. Raja Singh, Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2, Mr.L.Muralikrishnan, Standing Counsel for R3